Worcestershire have confirmed that they will play their first County Championship home game of the season at Kidderminster CC, with "unprecedented" levels of flooding leaving it impossible to stage the fixture at their New Road base.
The county played two Championship games at Kidderminster last year after disruption due to floods, and after two more floods since the start of 2020, the first home fixture against Sussex has already been moved to the ground.
Confirmation of the switch came in Worcestershire's annual chairman's report, in addition to the news that:
The club is not looking to recruit a new chief executive to replace Matt Rawnsley
There are "no excuses" for poor recent showings in the County Championship
"Disappointing" commercial performance had necessitated a restructure
There is no immediate intention to install floodlights at New Road, which is the only main county ground not to have them
The club does not expect the £1.3 million guaranteed to each county by the ECB between 2020-24 to be supported by the Hundred alone
Hira, who was appointed chairman in September 2018, admitted that the increased regularity of floods at New Road was a "concern", stating that since the end of October 2019, the ground has been under water for 62 days. He also cited the fact that since the start of the 20th century, there have been only three years in which the ground has flooded five times: 2007, 2012 and 2019.
"Due to assistance from the ECB and our insurance policies, our results were not negatively impacted by flooding in 2019," Hira wrote. "That said we cannot continue to rely upon others to assist us.
"Our focus in the next year is to mitigate the losses of flooding by making sure our cellars, retail, disability access and museum are all above the flood plain."
The club is also anticipating an extension to the Graeme Hick Pavilion, but does not have plans to install floodlights. New Road is currently the only main county ground not to have floodlights after Taunton installed them ahead of the 2019 season, and their absence led to a farcical exit in the 2015 T20 Blast.
They had targeted an improved year commercially, but Hira confirmed that "regrettably these improvements did not occur".
Worcestershire recorded a statutory loss (before tax) of £89,000 in 2019, compared to a £124,000 profit in 2018, but after eliminating the impact of flooding, and the positive effects of on-field success in reaching T20 Blast Finals Day to compare like-for-like performance, the club estimated on an underlying basis "that for 2019, the loss increases to £492k which is a very sharp £627k decline in profitability compared to the 2018 results".
Chief executive Matt Rawnsley left the club without explanation in October 2019, and Hira's "working assumption" is that he will not be replaced, with poor results leading to a decision to restructure with "more focussed, specific roles and responsibilities".
With regards to the Hundred, Hira stressed that he did not believe Worcestershire's financial status was dependent on the new competition being successful.
"One of the key slides I have seen from the ECB is the expectation that all formats of cricket will grow in 2020," he wrote. "I hope that is the case but this needs to be supported by active marketing and promotion of all formats of the game.
"I do not believe the Hundred is the determinant of financial success for cricket as it is portrayed, it is merely a possible contributor. The often sighted laudable aim is to open the sport up to new audiences. The new TV rights deal secured for 2020-24 at vastly higher levels than the previous agreement (a credit to the ECB) shows that the Hundred accounts for a relatively small component of secured TV revenues (14%) - it is however pleasing that some cricket at least will be shown on terrestrial TV.
"The justification often mentioned when discussing the impact of the new Hundred competition is the additional income of £1.3m per year between 2020-24 which all first-class counties like ours are guaranteed to receive. The economics of The Hundred over this period (at least) will not support these levels of payments - it is unlikely to generate enough to pay each county £1.3m.
"Therefore cross-subsidisation is occurring through other income streams secured by the ECB (of which other TV rights accounts for 86% of revenues). My calculations indicate approximately 40% of these additional payments to counties are from other ECB income.
"The largest and most important component of income for the ECB and therefore for ourselves is currently through red-ball, Test cricket. To the purist, hopefully this supports the need and our desire to preserve this format of the game as well as the ongoing need to invest in county cricket."
With regards to on-field performance, the report lauded Worcestershire's achievements in white-ball cricket - the club reached the quarter-finals of the One-Day Cup and only failed to retain their T20 Blast title on the last ball of the final - but stressed disappointment at their County Championship struggles.
The club finished ninth in Division Two having targeted promotion, and have won only 23 of 74 games across the last five seasons.
"There are no excuses for 2019 performance but the path to achieving any goal is rarely linear and not immediate especially in sport," Hira wrote. "The Cricket Steering Group (CSG) led by Paul Pridgeon have reflected and been very self-critical.
"There have been changes and the expectation and hope is of improvement in the coming year."
For the first time ever, the BCCI has given the nod for the Cricket Advisory Committee (CAC) to review the performance of the selectors annually. The move, the CAC believes, will enhance the overall quality of Indian cricket, with the selectors becoming more accountable.
The CAC, which met in the last two days, had picked former India left-arm spinner Sunil Joshi and former India fast bowler Harvinder Singh as the two new members of the five-member men's selection committee. The CAC comprises former India fast bowlers Madan Lal and RP Singh along with former India women's cricketer Sulakshana Naik.
The review, at present, will apply to Joshi and Harvinder and in future the three new selectors once the tenure of the three existing selectors - Sarandeep Singh, Devang Gandhi and Jatin Paranjape - expires later this year.
"The CAC will review the candidates after a one-year period and make the recommendations to the BCCI," a BCCI media release, announcing the new selectors, authorised by the board secretary Jay Shah, said on Wednesday.
RP Singh explained that a review was pertinent because the selectors are equal stakeholders along with the team management and players when the overall performance is evaluated.
"Everybody is accountable and the performance of the selectors will be reviewed as per the performance of the team," RP Singh said. "The selectors are an equal part of the (India) team's performance. This is why the CAC will review their performance after one year and that is why this provision is there. Everything depends on how the team plays. It will be also seen that you [sic] are working on the first-class structure to build the team."
Lal also said that the CAC would pay attention to whether the selectors are providing the opportunities to the relevant players, and communicating with the team management. "We come to know how the selector is faring, how he is picking the team, is he bringing the right junior players to the senior-level, how he is communicating with the seniors, captain and coach, we will keep this in mind."
In the wake of another public confrontation between New York Knicks ownership and a personality closely associated with the team, former Knicks enforcer Charles Oakley says the NBA should step in to fix the issue.
"It's got to be stopped in some kind of way," Oakley told The Associated Press in a phone interview Tuesday night. "The NBA has got to take a look at this. You can't keep closing your eyes to this. This is like, turn your head if you see someone beat somebody up and you just keep walking."
Longtime Knicks fan Spike Lee told ESPN on Tuesday that he wouldn't attend another home game this season following a confrontation with security Monday over which entrance he could use at Madison Square Garden.
"It just keeps happening in New York," Oakley said. "People are not going to come here because it's the same thing over and over and over. They got a new president, and all everyone is talking about what happened between Spike Lee and the Garden."
The incident occurred on the first night on the job for Leon Rose, the longtime player agent who was hired Monday as team president.
Oakley also addressed Lee's altercation with ESPN's Golic and Wingo on Wednesday, saying Knicks owner James Dolan is the consistent problem.
"What is this man's problem about control? He's so much a control freak. And he's hurting the whole NBA," Oakley said. "... If I'm an owner in the NBA, this guy headlines every other month, every other week, with something that has nothing to do with winning. It's got to do with individuals, with people's lives. We shouldn't be going through this."
Oakley had his spat with the Knicks in 2017, when he was arrested after an altercation with security officials. Oakley sued Dolan and Madison Square Garden, but the case was dismissed last month.
MSG called for "peace between us" when a federal judge dismissed Oakley's claim, though the rebounding machine said he will appeal.
"There should have been peace anyway," Oakley told the AP. "I played there 10 years. Show me some respect. They keep disrespecting me. I feel sorry for the people who stuff keeps happening to. It's just not right."
Judge Richard J. Sullivan ruled last month in U.S. District Court in Manhattan that the case "had the feel of a public relations campaign" and Oakley hadn't alleged a plausible legal claim under federal pleading standards.
Oakley had alleged assault, battery and false imprisonment, along with defamation after Dolan and the Knicks implied he had a problem with alcohol. Oakley was sitting near Dolan at a game on Feb. 8, 2017. He was approached by security soon after arriving and began to scuffle with them before he was removed from his seat and arrested.
"I didn't do nothing," Oakley said. "I got drug out and talked about like I was a person laying in the street."
The Knicks' latest case happened Monday night when a video circulated online during New York's 125-123 victory over the Houston Rockets showing Lee getting frustrated and yelling at Garden security outside an elevator, leading to confusion that he may have been thrown out of the building. However, a Knicks spokesman said that was untrue and that it was simply an issue of Lee using the wrong entrance.
Lee said he has been using the employee entrance on 33rd Street for more than two decades as a season-ticket holder. The Knicks wanted him to use the entrance for celebrities, which is two blocks away.
Oakley said he wasn't suprised at Lee's treatment.
"It's a plantation over there. It's bad," Oakley told Golic and Wingo. "People don't want to talk about it. It's real bad over there.
"I mean, this man's been buying tickets for 28 years, over $10 million, and you curse him out if he comes in this door or that door?"
The Knicks are 19-42 and headed toward their seventh straight season out of the playoffs.
"I ain't ever seen a team lose make this much news," Oakley told the AP. "Maybe the Dallas Cowboys."
The future came quickly for the New England Patriots. This time last year, Bill Belichick and Tom Brady were celebrating another Super Bowl victory. Brady hadn't posted big numbers in the Super Bowl, and Rob Gronkowski was weeks away from retiring, but there was little to be concerned about in New England. As long as the Patriots had the ageless Brady at quarterback and the peerless Belichick planning out what was to come, the future seemed bright for the greatest sports dynasty of this century.
What happens next is uncertain. Brady's contract voids in two weeks, and the Patriots are not allowed to use the franchise tag on him. For the first time since he took over as the Patriots' starter in 2001, there's a realistic chance he will play somewhere else. Belichick has signed veteran backups and drafted guys who might have eventually taken over for Brady if the timing had been right, but this is another animal altogether.
How do you replace the greatest football player of all time? Let's run through why the Patriots are left with limited options and whom they can choose from, starting with the move they made to reward Brady last August that might have backfired:
OK, deadline might be a strong word, but the Patriots would greatly prefer to get any Brady deal done by 4 p.m. ET on March 18. Do you remember when the Pats handed Brady a "two-year, $70 million extension" last August? Well, the deal Brady signed wasn't for two years, wasn't going to net $70 million and wasn't an extension. Beyond that, the deal was exactly as you heard.
The real purpose of the Brady extension was to give the star quarterback a raise while simultaneously lowering his cap hold. Before the deal, Brady was going to take home $15 million in cash while counting for $27 million on the New England cap. After he signed his new contract, though, he took home $23 million in cash and was responsible for only $21.5 million on the New England cap, freeing up $5.5 million in additional cap room for the Patriots to add somebody like Antonio Brown. (If you're one of the truthers who insist that Brady has always taken less money to do right by the team, don't ask why he needed to get a raise before last season.)
To somehow pay Brady more and be responsible for less in 2019, the Patriots added what are known as voidable years to Brady's deal. They reduced his $14 million base salary in 2019 from the old deal to $1 million but added a $20.25 million signing bonus. They paid Brady that money up front but spread the money over three years (the year left on Brady's old deal and the two-year "extension") for cap purposes. Brady has $30 million and $32 million base salaries in 2021 and 2022 to get to that average of $35 million per year, but he'll never see those seasons.
We know this for sure because Brady's contract is set to explode on the first day of the league year, which voids the remainder of the deal. The Saints have pursued a similar track with Drew Brees, and the Patriots followed in kind with Brady's deal. Once Brady's deal voids, the Pats will be responsible for $13.5 million in dead money for Brady on their 2020 cap, regardless of what happens. Even if they re-sign Brady after March 18, they would be on the hook for both the $13.5 million in dead money and whatever his new deal looks like in 2020.
On the other hand, if the Patriots re-sign Brady before the new league year begins, the dead money will get folded back into his new deal. The team would still owe $6.75 million on its cap for his old contract in both 2020 and 2021, but that's a far more manageable sum with which to work.
Is $13.5 million an insurmountable sum? Not in a league in which the salary cap is likely to rise north of $200 million. The Patriots, who are projected to have $44 million in cap room, would find a way to pay a starting quarterback and field a competitive team in 2020 with that dead money on their cap. It's also enough to potentially keep them from retaining someone like Devin McCourty or adding a key player like Austin Hooper to their roster. Without the ability to use the franchise tag on Brady and with this $13.5 million time bomb looming on their cap, they are going to feel significant pressure to re-sign Brady before the league year begins. It's no surprise that Brady's camp has repeatedly leaked its interest in exploring its options in free agency. It's exactly what the Patriots don't want and precisely what is likely to generate the best offer for the future Hall of Famer.
With that in mind, March 18 will serve as a de facto deadline for the Patriots. Their offer isn't suddenly going to get better after they're forced to deal with the dead money, and the teams competing for Brady are likely to increase their own proposals. He and his camp also know the best thing for New England is to sign a deal before March 18, and if he's returning, he's going to want the Pats to have that extra cap space for someone like Hooper. If the clock strikes 4 p.m. in New York that Wednesday and Brady hasn't reupped with the Patriots, my best guess is that he'll be leaving for a new team.
Bill Belichick & Co. have to be considering what life might be like without their star quarterback. Let's start by evaluating what the Patriots currently have to replace Brady.
The incumbent to replace Brady
If Brady leaves, New England will be left with former Browns starter Cody Kessler and 2019 fourth-round pick Jarrett Stidham on the roster. Kessler posted competent numbers while going 0-8 for the 1-15 Browns in 2016, but he posted a passer rating of 72.8 on 154 pass attempts for his 2017-18 time with the Browns and Jaguars. He was signed in September and is regarded by the league as something close to a replacement-level quarterback.
Before adding anybody else to their roster, the Patriots would be moving forward with Stidham as their starting quarterback. Nobody would have expected a sixth-round pick to turn into the greatest player ever, of course, but the recent track record for fourth-round picks isn't particularly exciting. Thirty-one quarterbacks were taken in the fourth round between 1995 and 2015, and just two of them have made it to the Pro Bowl. Kirk Cousins has two trips under his belt, and David Garrard made a lone visit during his time starting for the Jaguars. Only eight of the 31 passers even completed a season as their team's starting quarterback, and just four of the 31 quarterbacks started more than two campaigns: Cousins, Garrard, Aaron Brooks and Kyle Orton.
I chose 2015 as an end point because I wanted to work with a 20-year window and give the passers some time to develop, but if we expanded the sample by a year, we'd pick up another starter in Dak Prescott (plus Connor Cook and Cardale Jones). Whether you want to use four out of 31 or five out of 34 as your estimate, it's clear that the league didn't evaluate Stidham as a future starter at the NFL level.
Of course, the NFL is notoriously bad at evaluating quarterbacks. Players such as Jimmy Garoppolo (second-rounder), Jacoby Brissett (third-rounder), Matt Cassel (seventh-rounder), and Brian Hoyer (undrafted free agent) have all gone on to start at least one season after leaving New England. Whether it's learning under Brady or merely getting extra opportunities by virtue of graduating from Belichick University, the Patriots' quarterback picks have enjoyed longer and more meaningful careers than we would have expected by their draft status.
Stidham represents a particularly unusual case. Most quarterbacks improve steadily during their college career and post their best campaign in their final year before turning pro. That was decidedly not the case for Baylor transfer Stidham, who regressed badly between 2017 and 2018. After completing 66.5% of his passes and averaging 8.5 yards per attempt in 2017 for Auburn, he fell to a 60.7% completion rate and 7.6 yards per attempt in 2018.
Stidham returned leading wideouts Ryan Davis and Darius Slayton in 2018 but lost running back Kerryon Johnson and offensive lineman Braden Smith. It's easy to imagine a scenario in which Stidham was under colossal pressure in his final season, and there were certainly games when that was the case, but his pressure rate and sack rate actually dropped between 2017 and 2018. It was disconcerting to see his completion percentage fall off dramatically while his air yards per attempt fell from 8.3 AY/A to just 7.1 in 2018.
The Patriots probably believe that the quarterback who appeared to be ascending before 2018 is truer to Stidham's future than the guy who stumbled in his final year with the Tigers. They haven't typically targeted passers like that in the past -- passers like Garoppolo and Ryan Mallett had their best seasons just before leaving school -- but Hoyer is an example of someone who took a step backward in his final year as an amateur and then looked better after studying behind Brady. New England will obviously hope Stidham's lone year of matriculation behind the team's longtime starter will pay off in the years to come.
Even if the Patriots are optimistic about Stidham, it's incredibly unlikely that they'll go into 2020 without adding at least one viable starter to their quarterback room.
The free-agent options to replace Brady
Let's take a look at the players the Patriots will be able to target in free agency. Some of these players would take over as the immediate starter in New England, while others would merely be competing for backup work alongside Stidham. I've included pros and cons for each passer from the Patriots' perspective:
2019 team:Saints | Age entering the 2020 season: 27
Pros: Bridgewater's accuracy and ability to work through his progressions in the pocket make him arguably the closest comp for Brady's biggest on-field strengths. Bridgewater has also followed in Brady's footsteps and done a solid job of protecting the football; after his rookie season, he has thrown just 13 interceptions on 668 pass attempts for an interception rate of 1.9%. The Louisville product threw just two picks on 196 pass attempts filling in for Drew Brees last season, with Bridgewater completing nearly 68% of his passes while winning all five of his starts.
What might make Bridgewater most appealing to the Patriots, though, is his age. At 27, Bridgewater still has the bulk of his career to come. While passers such as Jameis Winston and Marcus Mariota are in the same age range, Bridgewater has the highest floor of the younger signal-callers. If he can re-create his 2019 form with the Patriots, he would give the Pats a quarterback they can win with in 2020 and beyond.
Cons: Any team has to be concerned with the catastrophic knee injury Bridgewater suffered during the 2016 preseason. The injury happened during practice, and Bridgewater has generally done a good job of avoiding hits as a pro, but he has thrown only 221 pass attempts over the past four seasons. At the very least, New England would need to give Bridgewater's knee a thorough look before committing to him on a long-term deal.
With that in mind, the Patriots might hold reservations about Bridgewater's size. It's worth remembering that they famously chose the 6-foot-4, 225-pound Brady over 6-foot, 200-pound Louisiana Tech quarterback Tim Rattay, in part, because Brady was the bigger passer. Belichick has drafted 11 quarterbacks during his time in New England, and the 6-foot-2, 215-pound Bridgewater is smaller by either height, weight or both than each of those 11. Belichick might not pass up a franchise quarterback for the want of an inch or 10 pounds, but the Patriots would likely prefer a bigger quarterback if all else was equal.
Pros: Rivers offers the Patriots a plug-and-play solution like no one else in this class. The veteran's experience and meticulous preparation allow him to handle just about everything from the moment the play is called to the moment the ball is out of his hands. Rivers' ability to set and reset protections would come in handy for a Patriots team that is likely to lose left guard Joe Thuney and fill-in center Ted Karras to free agency, while center David Andrews' future remains uncertain after missing all of 2019 with a pulmonary embolism.
While the Pats' line struggled in 2019, the upside with players such as Isaiah Wynn and Marcus Cannon when healthy should make Rivers look much better than he did in Los Angeles. And while Rivers did throw 20 interceptions, a league-leading seven of those picks came in the final five minutes of the game while his team was trailing. He was forced to make desperate throws to try to push the Chargers back into the game. With a better defense, Rivers wouldn't be put in a position to make those sort of passes. In 2018, for example, he threw 12 interceptions in 16 games and just one pick while trailing during the final five minutes.
Cons: The Patriots have long prided themselves on Brady's ability to move the ball steadily down the field without turning it over. Rivers is much more of a boom-or-bust quarterback, and New England would have to change its offense to account for that. While you can imagine a scenario in which Julian Edelman serves as the new Keenan Allen for Rivers, the Patriots don't yet have anything at tight end and would need N'Keal Harry to step up as a downfield threat in the vein of Mike Williams.
Rivers would also be one of the most expensive options on the market -- he would likely expect to take home something at or in excess of $30 million per season. The Patriots can use voidable years to try to reduce his short-term cap hit, but that would only create a future dead money mark down the line for Belichick, just like the one he's dealing with now for Brady. At 38, Rivers would also be only a short-term solution for the Patriots.
There's also a chance Rivers' decline in 2019 ends up as a permanent problem. It's fair to note that he was affected by a dismal offensive line, but even when you take out the plays on which he was pressured, he ranked 21st in QBR and 25th in passer rating. Joe Flacco, who will likely be available for a few million dollars on a one-year deal after he's cut by the Broncos, posted a nearly identical passer rating and a better QBR when teams didn't pressure him in Denver. I would almost certainly rather have Rivers than Flacco, but if Rivers is a below-average starter even with improved pass protection, the Patriots would probably regret paying him $30 million per season.
Pros: Winston still has tantalizing upside. When he gets hot, there are few quarterbacks in the league who have the 2015 first overall pick's ability to threaten defenses at every level. Winston is also a quietly adept scrambler for his size and has been able to play through injuries. He has missed just three games through injury in five years.
There are obvious negatives with Winston, and I'll get to them in a moment, but the argument would be that the Patriots could acquire a quarterback in the prime of his career who might be able to turn the corner with better coaching and more stability in Foxborough, Massachusetts. The Patriots have taken shots on players with off-field issues when Belichick felt like the upside was worth the risk. A 26-year-old starting quarterback to replace Brady would be more valuable than any risk Belichick has taken with the Patriots before.
Cons: To start, there are the turnovers. Winston has 88 interceptions and 50 fumbles in 72 games. For context, Brady has 36 interceptions and 26 fumbles over that same five-season time frame. There's always a chance that Josh McDaniels & Co. could fix those issues, but we have a sample of more than 2,500 pass attempts in which Winston has made inexplicable decisions with the football.
Last season was supposed to be when Winston got an upgrade by swapping out coach Dirk Koetter for Bruce Arians. Instead, Winston threw 30 picks and posted a career-high interception rate of 4.8%. After adjusting for era, he posted the fifth-worst interception rate for a quarterback with 300 passes or more since the merger. If the Patriots sign Winston, every television network will be waiting for him to throw a first-quarter pick-six before cutting to an unamused Belichick.
And while the Patriots have taken risks in the past, Winston's off-field baggage is considerable. He has been accused in multiple sexual assault cases and already has one NFL suspension in his past. It's possible that the market simply doesn't develop for Winston and the Patriots bring him in as a low-cost option, but it's difficult to see a scenario in which the Pats are excited to sign him.
Pros: With the Titans rumored to be going after Brady, one way to get back at former Patriot Mike Vrabel would be to sign Tennessee's breakout passer. Tannehill didn't have much of a market when the Dolphins were looking to trade their long-time starter, but Tannehill flourished in the play-action-heavy scheme of first-year offensive coordinator Arthur Smith.
Across 12 games last season, Tannehill led the league in passer rating (117.5) and yards per attempt (9.6), was third in completion percentage (70.3%) and finished ninth in Total QBR (62.2). He was much better than Brady over the same time frame, and Tannehill should still have several years of above-average play remaining.
Cons: Before 2019, Tannehill had completed 62.8% of his passes, averaged 7.0 yards per attempt and posted a passer rating of 87.0. What we saw from him in Tennessee was a massive leap unsupported by his level of play over nearly 3,200 pass attempts in Miami. History is littered with quarterbacks who looked decent, pieced together a dominant season, and then returned back to earth for the remainder of their careers, with guys such as Andy Dalton and Case Keenum as examples.
The Miami version of Tannehill is still a competent starter, but he is going to be expensive. It wouldn't be shocking to see him hit $30 million per season with two guaranteed years on his new contract if the Titans let him leave. You would pay that much for the Tannehill from 2019, but the guy who was competent in Miami wouldn't excite the Patriots. Injuries have also been a problem for Tannehill, who tore his ACL in both 2016 and 2017 before missing five games in 2018 with a nerve problem.
Pros: Mariota will likely come cheap and won't require any sort of long-term deal if the Patriots are willing to give the former Heisman Trophy winner a shot at their starting job. Mariota's numbers and style of play are reminiscent of Tannehill's performance in Miami, with the Oregon product coming in right around league average when he has been on the field with the Titans. He would likely be looking at a one-year deal in the $8 million range, and the Patriots could tack on several years as a team option at a reasonable salary if Mariota excels.
It's reasonable to think Mariota might benefit from stability, given that he famously cycled through five offensive coordinators in five seasons with the Titans. Guys such as Jason Michael and Terry Robiskie haven't been coordinators since leaving Tennessee, either. McDaniels & Co. would bring another new scheme, but they could get the most out of Mariota.
Cons: It's just as easy to note that coordinator after coordinator wasn't able to unlock the potential Mariota seemed to hold at Oregon or in small spurts at the professional level. The Titans ranked 30th in the NFL in points per possession during Mariota's six weeks as a starter in 2019 and then fourth in the NFL once Tannehill took over. Injuries also cost Mariota time in each of his first four seasons. The Patriots once flirted with the extreme tempo of the Chip Kelly offense Mariota ran in Oregon, but would they really risk upsetting their offense and exposing their defense to do so again with Mariota?
Pros: While it's unlikely that the Patriots would turn their offense over to Hill as a full-time starter, the Saints' gadget passer could take some of the focus off whomever they start and serve as a weapon on trick plays and in the red zone. New England could transition to more of a run-focused attack after Brady, and Hill can both serve as an effective runner and help create running lanes for Sony Michel and the rest of the Patriots' backs.
Cons: While Saints coach Sean Payton has said all the right things about Hill, it's telling that New Orleans barely used Hill when Brees went down; he played just 49 offensive snaps during Bridgewater's five starts. Acquiring Hill would likely cost the Patriots a second-round pick, assuming the Saints tender Hill, the only restricted free agent on this list, as such. It also wouldn't give the Patriots a short- or long-term solution for handling the majority of their dropbacks.
Pros: Keenum was excellent during the 2017 season with the Vikings, when he completed nearly 68% of his passes and posted a passer rating of 98.3 while helping push the Vikings to the NFC Championship Game. He hasn't been quite as impressive in subsequent stints with the Broncos and Washington, but even in 2019, he posted a passer rating of 91.3 for a hopeless team when Dwayne Haskins and Colt McCoy combined to hit a mark of just 74.3. Keenum is likely to nab a two-year deal in the $14 million range, which would be cheap for New England.
Cons: Keenum rarely had to carry the Vikings when they were trailing in the second half during that 2017 season, and outside of that one campaign, he has looked more like a solid No. 2 quarterback than somebody to trust with a starting job. Size is even more of a concern for the 6-foot-1 Keenum than it is for Bridgewater; the only quarterback under 6-foot-2 to throw passes for the Patriots in the Belichick era is Doug Flutie, who tossed 10 as a 43-year-old backup for Brady in 2005.
Pros: Bortles' size (6-foot-5, 236 pounds) and athleticism are still pluses. The Patriots' most recent run-in with Bortles also didn't go well, as the former third overall pick threw for 376 yards and four touchdowns in a 31-20 win over the Patriots in Week 2 of the 2018 season. Nobody is expecting that the Patriots will happily turn things over to Bortles, but after spending a year learning under Sean McVay, he would be looking at a one-year deal for not much more than the league minimum.
The idea of the Patriots signing Bortles on a one-year deal to compete as a backup could make some sense, but anything more than that might be seen as a cry for help.
Pros: With the Broncos likely to release Flacco, the Patriots could add a veteran who always seemed to exceed expectations against New England in the postseason. Flacco won two of his four battles with Brady, and while he was 4-of-10 for 34 yards in one of those, the 35-year-old could plausibly be 4-0 against the Pats in the postseason.
Flacco threw four touchdown passes in the 35-31 loss to New England during the 2014 playoffs, when the Patriots used an unbalanced line to trick the Ravens with a tactic which was outlawed after the season. In the other loss, Flacco drove the Ravens into the red zone late in the fourth quarter down 23-20, only for Lee Evans to drop a would-be touchdown catch and Billy Cundiff to miss a 32-yard field goal which would have forced overtime. If the NFL had banned the reporting tactic or kicker Justin Tucker had arrived a year earlier, Baltimore might have made two additional Super Bowl trips with Flacco.
Cons: What I wrote above is a generous interpretation of events, and Flacco has been a below-average quarterback since his Super Bowl XLVII run during the 2012 playoffs. While Flacco once held the sort of arm strength that scared opposing safeties, he has turned into a quarterback who almost always seeks out an easy checkdown without ever threatening to create bigger gains. Brady was also comfortable taking the easy completions, of course, but he combined that accuracy with an infinitesimal interception rate, something Flacco doesn't have. Injuries in recent years also make Flacco little more than a last-gasp option for the Pats.
The trade options to replace Brady
The Patriots could also pursue a number of options via trade. One logical candidate is Andy Dalton, who has been linked to the Bears and would be available on what amounts to a one-year deal for $17.5 million. New England could try to get Dalton to restructure that deal as part of a trade, and wouldn't need to give up much more than a late-round pick to acquire the longtime Bengals starter.
I wouldn't be too optimistic about Dalton, however. He isn't much bigger than Bridgewater, and the Red Rifle has struggled with his accuracy. Over the past three seasons, Dalton has completed just 60.3% of his passes despite averaging just over 7.9 air yards per target. The latter figure ranks 22nd among 41 qualifying passers, but the former mark is 36th in the league. Dalton would make sense at about half of his current price.
It appears the Panthers are likely to keep Cam Newton and the Lions intend to hold onto Matthew Stafford, but both veterans could come available if their teams fall in love with young passers in the 2020 NFL draft. Newton is on a one-year, $18.6 million contract, while Stafford's contract might be more dealable than it seems; the Lions would owe anywhere from $18.8 million to $32 million in dead money, depending on when Stafford would be traded and how the league executes rarely seen cap rules for the final year of the collective bargaining agreement. Neither veteran is likely to hit the market.
On the other hand, the Patriots could take fliers on a pair of players who should be extremely available. Josh Rosen, the No. 10 overall pick in the 2018 draft, has now failed to impress with both the Cardinals and Dolphins and should qualify as deeply distressed goods after posting a passer rating of 63.5 on 502 pass attempts. The Patriots could offer him a far superior offensive infrastructure. While Miami might be reticent to deal its backup within the division, Rosen is likely about to become the third-stringer and has no future there. A late-round pick could get the job done, and Rosen has less than $5 million left on his rookie deal, which would include offsets if the Patriots moved on.
At the other end of the financial spectrum is Nick Foles, who famously upset the Patriots in Super Bowl LII just over two years ago. Foles' first season with the Jaguars was a disaster, as he fractured his collarbone in the first quarter of Week 1, missed 10 games, then lost his job back to Gardner Minshew after just three starts. Foles' upside is clear, but the former Eagles and Rams starter has more than $21 million in guarantees remaining on his deal. A new CBA would give the two teams more options, but Jacksonville would need to either pay some of Foles' guarantees and/or attach a draft pick to shed his contract onto the Patriots. His injury issues would make him a dangerous long-term option for Belichick & Co., though he could offer a short-term solution.
The best quarterback at least adjacent to the market is Dallas starter Dak Prescott, who is likely to attract the franchise tag from the Cowboys in the coming days. This isn't really the place for a lengthy Prescott analysis, but the 26-year-old just finished 10th in passer rating and fourth in QBR for a Cowboys team which ended the season second in offensive DVOA. Prescott isn't peak Brady, but he's better than anybody else New England could plausibly add in free agency or via trade this offseason.
Understandably for a player who was vastly underpaid during his rookie deal, Prescott is looking to approach the top of the market with his new contract, which would come in around $35 million per season. The Cowboys can keep Prescott with one of two franchise tags. The exclusive franchise tag would cost $33 million and ensure that no team can negotiate with him. Crucially for a team that might need to franchise Prescott again in 2021, though, the Cowboys can hand Prescott the non-exclusive franchise tag and pay him somewhere closer to $28 million.
The non-exclusive tag would allow teams to negotiate with Prescott and offer him a contract; the Cowboys would have the right to match and receive two first-round picks if they decide against keeping their starting quarterback. While there's a scenario in which the Patriots could go after Prescott and send away what are likely to be two late first-round picks, I'm not sure Belichick would be willing to outlay a top-of-the-market deal and two first-rounders for Prescott. And despite their protests, the Cowboys might match any offer sheet for Prescott anyway.
If Brady did sign with the 49ers, there's also the small matter of one Jimmy Garoppolo, who would then be up for trade on what amounts to a three-year, $76.3 million deal with no guarantees. The Patriots require no introductions to their former second-round pick, although their feelings toward Garoppolo might have changed after seeing him start 24 games with the 49ers. With both teams missing second-round picks, New England might need to send its first-rounder to get a deal done. Of course, the chances of what would amount to a Brady-Garoppolo swap are remarkably slim.
Likewise, if the Raiders end up signing Brady, the Patriots could respond with a move for Derek Carr. Carr had a solid season in 2019, finishing ninth in the NFL in passer rating and 10th in QBR for an Oakland team that didn't have much to work with at wide receiver. He won't excite Patriots fans, but he's a reasonably high-floor option and would come on a three-year, $58.5 million deal with no remaining guaranteed money. There are worse moves New England could make for a late-round pick, especially if guys like Rivers and Bridgewater are already snapped up early in free agency.
The draft options to replace Brady
New England could also add to Stidham and Kessler by using a draft pick on a quarterback. The Pats pick 23rd, which means they have no realistic shot of ending up with someone like LSU's Joe Burrow or Alabama's Tua Tagovailoa. It would be a major surprise if either Oregon's Justin Herbert or Utah State's Jordan Love fell all the way to 23, while Georgia's Jake Fromm and Washington's Jacob Eason might not be worthy of a first-round pick.
It's possible that Belichick could try to move up from No. 23 to grab someone like Love if he falls out of the top 10, but I'm skeptical. While Belichick trades up more frequently than most observers think, there's nothing in his draft history suggesting he's likely to package multiple first-round picks to move up. The Patriots don't have a second-round pick after using it to acquire Mohamed Sanu, which also costs them a significant draft asset.
They are projected to get a pair of compensatory picks at the end of the third round for losing Trey Flowers and Trent Brown, but I don't see the sort of haul they can offer to compete with teams like the Colts or Jaguars in moving up to grab a passer. It's more likely that New England trades down and draft someone like Fromm in the second round as opposed to moving up for a quarterback.
I don't know how much we can realistically suss out from Belichick's history with quarterbacks to try to figure out who the Patriots might target in the draft. They seem to value size, although not at the sort of level a team like the Broncos do. They've gone after four-year starters like Garoppolo and yet also drafted and promoted Cassel, who threw 33 college passes. Brady's accuracy has kept the Patriots going on offense for years, but Belichick has drafted quarterbacks like Brissett and Mallett, who weren't particularly accurate at the college level. About the only thing I can rule out, unfortunately for Pats fans, is that they're not going to somehow trick the Bengals into letting them draft Burrow.
The Brady replacement, and who I'd pick
After all that, the most likely starting quarterback for the Patriots in Week 1 of the 2020 season is still Tom Brady. Of the available options, the Pats give Brady the best chance of winning another Super Bowl, let alone whatever comfort he enjoys from playing his first 20 seasons in New England. And while players such as Carr and Tannehill produced better numbers in 2019, there's not a quarterback who projects as a clearly superior choice with the Patriots' roster in 2020 than Brady. It still makes the most sense for both sides to reunite on a deal.
If Brady does leave, though, the Patriots could look toward acquiring his replacement from the team that adds him. If the Titans sign him, New England would target Tannehill. If the Raiders sign him, the Pats would be in line to go after Carr. If the 49ers somehow pull off a Brady move, New England would be the best landing spot for Garoppolo. The Chargers have already moved on from Rivers, but if Brady ends up in Los Angeles, the status quo elsewhere in the league could leave Rivers as the best option remaining for the Patriots.
play
4:45
Breaking down the Brady effect
Adam Schefter, Louis Riddick and Mike Tannenbaum speculate where Tom Brady will land and how it will affect other quarterbacks in the league.
It's not up to me, but of the available options, I'd choose Bridgewater. The knee is obviously a concern, and Bridgewater played well behind one of the league's best offensive lines and with a brilliant mind calling plays in 2019, but nobody in this group offers his combination of youth, accuracy, intelligence and possible upside. I'm not sure Bridgewater will be the best passer in this group in 2020, but he's likely to produce the most value over the next five seasons if he can stay healthy.
What happens next could define the decade for the Patriots. Teams such as the 49ers and Packers have managed to swap out one Hall of Famer for another, but ask Bills, Broncos and Dolphins fans about what has happened to their franchises after Jim Kelly, John Elway and Dan Marino left town. They've combined to win one Super Bowl and cycled through quarterback after quarterback, with Peyton Manning's free-agent stint in Denver one of the rare exciting runs. Fail to replace a legend the first time and you might spend the better part of 20 years trying over and over again to solve the same problem. Unless they can convince Brady to return, the Patriots are two weeks away from facing the most difficult question of the Belichick era in New England.
The Basketball Tournament, the 64-team, $2 million, winner-take-all summer event entering its seventh season, will change its rules to reduce the chances of a game ending on free throws, tournament officials told ESPN.
If a team commits a foul while in the bonus during the Elam Ending -- which has teams play to a target score rather than to the end of a clock -- the other team will get only one foul shot, rather than two, and retain possession of the ball, said Jonathan Mugar, TBT's founder and CEO.
The change comes after the NBA used a version of the Elam Ending for the 2020 All-Star Game in Chicago, which ended when Anthony Davis sank a free throw to take Team LeBron to the target score.
The main goal of the Elam Ending, created by Ball State professor Nick Elam, was to eliminate intentional fouls by teams trailing down the stretch. Elam got the idea for the new tweak from a user he interacted with on a message board as he developed his original proposal, Mugar said.
The adjustment reduces the incentive for defensive teams to foul in one specific situation: when they are within one or two of the target score and the team with the ball is three points away from the target score. Under the old Elam Ending system, the defensive team had incentive to foul to prevent a potential game-winning 3-pointer and then get the ball with a chance to win. Under the new system, the fouled team would get one free throw to potentially pull within two of the target score and get the ball back with a chance to win.
A total of 22.8% of TBT games -- 33 out of 145 -- have ended on free throws since it adopted the Elam Ending, Mugar said.
For the All-Star Game, the NBA calculated the target score by adding 24 -- Kobe Bryant's last uniform number for the Los Angeles Lakers -- to the leading team's total after three quarters and played the entire fourth quarter without a clock. Team LeBron defeated Team Giannis 157-155 after a fourth quarter that lasted 15 minutes in game time but almost 40 minutes in real time.
The Basketball Tournament has been using a target score instead of a clock to end games since 2017. The TBT's target score is calculated by adding eight points to the leading team's score at the first stoppage inside the four-minute mark of the fourth quarter.
The Big 3, a summer 3-on-3 league co-founded by Ice Cube, has also used a target score since 2017.
The response to the ending format at the All-Star Game in Chicago was mostly positive. Byron Spruell, the NBA's president of league operations, told ESPN three days later that it was a "good assumption" the league would use a variation of the Elam Ending at next season's All-Star Game. He also said the league would discuss using it in a midseason tournament should the NBA board of governors approve commissioner Adam Silver's proposal for one. Spruell cautioned that the league at this point is unlikely to adopt the target score rule for the G League.
Spruell told ESPN that the NBA was already thinking of ways to make it less likely for a team to win the All-Star Game on free throws. Those include taking points away from a defensive team that commits a foul on a potential game-winning possession -- rather than awarding points for foul shots -- or forcing the player who commits the foul to be substituted out, Spruell said.
The Boston Red Sox are waiting on one more medical opinion on Chris Sale's injured elbow before they make a decision on the ace pitcher's status.
Red Sox interim manager Ron Roenicke told reporters Wednesday that the team is still waiting on an opinion from renowned surgeon Dr. Neal ElAttrache.
Roenicke stressed that the Red Sox "need to get this right" before determining how to proceed with Sale.
ElAttrache is the third medical expert to review the MRI on Sale's left elbow, along with surgeon Dr. James Andrews and the Red Sox medical staff.
"We need to get this right," Roenicke told reporters. "We want as many opinions as we can. Dr. Andrews saw it and read the MRI. I don't want to comment on it until we get one more opinion."
Sale underwent the MRI on Tuesday after experiencing elbow soreness following his first live batting practice session.
The 30-year-old Sale saw Andrews in August after the seven-time All-Star was shut down for the season with elbow inflammation. Sale had a platelet-rich plasma injection at the time but avoided surgery.
Sale threw to batters Sunday for the first time since August and told the team of the soreness in his elbow Monday.
The Red Sox had already said that Sale would start this season on the injured list after he reported to camp with pneumonia.
Last March, the Red Sox signed Sale to a five-year, $145 million contract extension. The new deal starts this season and runs through the 2024 season. Sale will earn $30 million per year from 2020 to 2022 and $27.5 million in 2023 and 2024.
Australian Nick Kyrgios has joined the line-up for this year's grass-court tournament at Queen's.
The 24-year-old, who was fined for unsportsmanlike conduct at last year's event, has been praised for improved on-court behaviour this season.
He has been in good form, reaching the Australian Open fourth round in January, and also won admirers for his response to the Australian bushfires.
"I've been playing well, so I'm pumped for what's to come," Kyrgios said.
After his Australian Open was ended with defeat by Spanish top seed Rafael Nadal, the world number 39 spoke of having "made progress as a human".
Last year at Queen's, he was fined £13,766 ($17,600) after accusing a line judge of "rigging the game", mocking the umpire and threatening to walk off court, as well as hitting a ball out of the stadium in another match.
The previous year, he had been fined £13,000 ($16,660) for making a lewd gesture with a water bottle at the London tournament.
In September 2019, he was put on a six-month probationary period after being given a suspended 16-week ban and $25,000 (£19,500) fine for "aggravated behaviour" on court.
The main grass-court event at Queen's will run from 15 to 21 June and be live on the BBC.
Kyrgios will be joined by Croatia's Marin Cilic, who said he would love to win a third title there to take his best form into Wimbledon, which starts the following week.
Top-10 players Daniil Medvedev of Russia and Greece's Stefanos Tsitsipas, plus Spanish defending champion Feliciano Lopez, had already confirmed they would be playing at Queen's, while organisers hope Britain's Andy Murray will recover from a pelvic injury in time.
In his latest BBC Sport column, Wales centre Hadleigh Parkes discusses Saturday's "brutal" Six Nations clash against England, the threat of Manu Tuilagi and how Sam Warburton is using WhatsApp to help Wales at the breakdown.
Every Test week is exciting but this one, England against Wales, the battle of the Severn Bridge, always feels particularly big.
It's going to be a brutal affair.
It should be an exciting game, and it's always a great occasion at Twickenham - a tough place to go and as players we want to go there and do well.
And as a fan, you've got to be pretty excited haven't you? It's a big occasion for all involved.
A lot of history goes with it and in recent years it's been pretty even. It will be a tough, physical game and England are playing well.
They're a big, strong team but they've also got some exciting players as well.
You look at the likes of Manu Tuilagi. He's a big man, a powerful boy - but he's not even the biggest in his family!
It's good to see him back playing. Unfortunately for him, he's had a pretty nasty time with injuries over the past couple of years but he's come back and played well for Leicester as well as England, and he had a good World Cup.
Manu's extremely powerful but he's also got great feet, he's a good distributor of the ball and he's got a bit of pace as well.
It's a challenge facing him but it's the kind of challenge you look forward to.
He gives England a lot of go-forward ball, gets them on to the front foot and allows the likes of Ben Youngs, George Ford and Owen Farrell and the outside backs to get into the game.
They've got some exciting players there and, with quick ball against defences which aren't set, they can create a lot of opportunities.
Any team with quick ball is a hard team to defend against because, if they get momentum, of course teams are going to make yards against you.
So you've got to get set in the right position and use line speed to get right into their faces and put their skills under pressure.
Every defence is breakable. Every defence is a system but the main thing is a good attitude - getting your shoulder on, using the right technique and putting in legal tackles, putting them on the deck and getting your jacklers into the game to slow their ball down.
Warburton's helping hand
That's a massive part of the game, so it's great that Sam Warburton - who was one of the best jacklers in the world when he was playing - has joined us as a breakdown technical advisor for this campaign.
The breakdown is so important in defence and attack, and Sam has been doing drills with the backs as well as the forwards during training sessions.
He's also been sending clips to us in our WhatsApp group, showing us good and bad examples of the breakdown.
Sam's been there and done that and it wasn't long ago he was playing.
He's new to coaching but he knows the game extremely well, players respect him hugely because he did so well with Wales and the British and Irish Lions.
What he brings is that little bit extra and I think the boys really enjoy working with him. Under Shaun Edwards, we attacked almost every breakdown in defence. Now, we're picking and choosing a lot more.
There was only a bit of crossover between Sam and me because he was injured when I first got into the Wales squad, but it must be odd for some of the guys who played with him who are now getting coached by him.
It's probably harder for Sam himself because he's part of the management team but he's played with so many of these boys, captained most of the boys in the squad, especially the older ones.
He's been on that side of the fence and now he's on the other.
You need a good balance of being able to socialise and have good craic with the boys, and then having to stand up in a meeting and be serious. It's a working balance and the boys are enjoying what he's doing.
Moving in the right direction
We were pretty disappointed as a team that we let a few opportunities slip in the loss to France last time out, and the bounce of the ball didn't go our way a few times, but well done to France.
It's probably the best we've played in this tournament - but we didn't get the victory so nobody cares whether we played well or not. The end result is what you want.
Ireland and France were both games where we had opportunities but we didn't take them.
We just have to keep learning and, next time we're in that position, we should be able to convert.
There is a new coaching group that's come in and certain things have changed, and it is building nicely. Our attacking game is taking a different shape and it takes time to get used to that.
But ultimately these are Test matches and we want to win.
There are other teams going through change as well. We want to do well and we want to win, especially at home.
As players, we're learning news ways of playing, some subtle differences, and it does take time.
The coaches are working with the players individually and collectively to make sure we're heading in the right direction. We want to play a brand of rugby we enjoy playing and that the fans enjoy watching - while winning.
Defence was not what we wanted against Ireland, France was a step in the right direction and we need to keep moving in the right direction.
For the latest Welsh rugby union news follow @BBCScrumV on Twitter.
CORONA, Calif. – Eibach Springs’ post-season IMCA awards program will pay off even more in 2020.
The Corona, Calif., manufacturer and 12th-year IMCA sponsor gives an Eibach-branded fire suit to a first-time state champion.
The drawing for that award will be held after point standings become official in late October; eligible drivers will have won their career-first IMCA Modified, IMCA Sunoco Late Model, IMCA Sunoco Stock Car, IMCA Sunoco Hobby Stock, Karl Kustoms Northern SportMod or Smiley’s Racing Products Southern SportMod state title.
Eibach again gives $100 certificates to drivers winning state championships in those six divisions. Those drivers also become eligible to win a drawing for a set of four springs.
“Eibach is excited to step up our participation with IMCA this year by offering a custom Team Eibach drivers suit to one of the first-time state champions,” said Sales Manager David Cardey. “We look forward to another great year and giving back to the short track community where we can.”
Seventy-seven of the 110 state champions crowned in 2019 earned career-first titles.
Eibach awards will be presented during the national banquet in November or mailed beginning the following week from the IMCA home office.
Information about the complete line of Eibach springs is available at the www.eibach.com website, by calling 800 507-2338 and on Facebook.
“Eibach ramped up their program last season by drawing winners for six sets of springs from our talented pool of state champions. This year goes further as they will spring a brand new Eibach-branded fire suit on an unsuspecting, yet deserving first-time state champion,” noted IMCA Marketing Director Kevin Yoder. “The Velocita-made suit will be a great reward for a great season.”
KANNAPOLIS, N.C. – Tony Stewart will compete in the NASCAR Xfinity Series race on July 4 at Indianapolis Motor Speedway in a Stewart-Haas Racing-prepared Ford Mustang.
The three-time NASCAR Cup Series champion and 2020 NASCAR Hall of Fame inductee will headline the inaugural Xfinity Series event on Indianapolis’ 2.439-mile, 14-turn road course, with the 62-lap race serving as Stewart’s 28th overall start at the Brickyard.
This summer’s Independence Day spectacular will, however, mark Stewart’s first IMS appearance in the Xfinity Series.
Stewart has competed in 18 Brickyard 400s, five Indianapolis 500s and four IROC Series races. He is a two-time Brickyard 400 winner (2005, 2007) and a member of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway Hall of Fame.
“Everyone knows what Indy means to me, so I can’t think of a better place to race on Fourth of July weekend,” said Stewart, who grew up 45 minutes from Indianapolis in the towns of Columbus and Rushville, Ind. “It’s going to be cool making history by turning left and right in a stock car at the Brickyard, and the racing will be full of action and contact.
“Any time you can drive any race car at IMS is special, and you know I’m going for the win,” he added. “The date is already circled on my calendar.”
The road course at Indianapolis has hosted IndyCar, Formula One, sports cars and even MotoGP, but never NASCAR. And while Stewart is no stranger to Indianapolis, be it in open-wheel Indy cars or full-bodied stock cars, he has never driven the road course in any type of race car.
But Stewart has proven to be prolific when turning left and right. He has eight road-course wins in the NASCAR Cup Series, including his 49th and final career victory in 2016 at Sonoma (Calif.) Raceway.
Stewart is second to only Jeff Gordon for the most road-course wins in the NASCAR Cup Series, with a tally that includes Sonoma in 2001, 2005 and 2016 and Watkins Glen (N.Y.) Int’l in 2002, 2004, 2005, 2007 and 2009.
Outside of the NASCAR Cup Series, Stewart has a road-course win in IROC and a near win in the prestigious Rolex 24 At Daytona. Stewart won Round III of IROC XXX on the Daytona (Fla.) Int’l Speedway road course en route to the 2006 series championship.
He also competed in the prestigious Rolex 24 At Daytona five times, with a best finish of third in 2005 with co-drivers Jan Lammers and Andy Wallace.
Stewart nearly won the 2004 Rolex 24 At Daytona, where with co-drivers Wallace and Dale Earnhardt Jr., they led 355 of the 526 laps available and had a commanding five-lap advantage before mechanical problems less than 20 minutes short of the finish ended their shot at victory and placed them a disappointing fourth.
Stewart’s most recent road-course outing came in a demonstration run last October at Circuit of the Americas in Austin, Texas.
He took an SHR-prepared Ford Mustang specially outfitted with a passenger seat around the 3.426-mile, 20-turn layout and showed Haas F1 Team drivers Romain Grosjean and Kevin Magnussen how to wheel a 3,200-pound race car around America’s only purpose-built Formula One track.
“It was a lot of fun for me to get in one of our Ford Mustangs and do that exhibition run at COTA,” Stewart said. “It kind of got my juices flowing to get back in a car again, and what better place to come back than Indianapolis Motor Speedway.”
The Indiana 150 will mark Stewart’s 95th career Xfinity Series start and his first since the 2013 season opener at Daytona, where Stewart collected his 11th Xfinity Series victory.
It will also mark Stewart’s first NASCAR start since the 2016 NASCAR Cup Series season finale at Homestead-Miami Speedway.
“People sometimes say, ‘We miss seeing you behind the wheel,” and I’m like, ‘Well, you’ve just got to go to different places now’,” said Stewart, who has collected 23 wins in an assortment of sprint car races since retiring as a full-time NASCAR driver at the end of the 2016 season. “I’m racing 100 times a year in a sprint car, but seeing some of these road-course races – especially the Roval at Charlotte – piqued my interest a bit, and running the stock car at COTA, it kind of fed my hunger.
“All of it has led me back to the place I’ve always called home – Indy.”
Details regarding Stewart’s car number, crew and primary partner will be announced closer to the race.
I Dig® is a leading global brand that makes it more enjoyable to surf the internet, conduct transactions and access, share, and create information. Today I Dig®attracts millions of users every month.r
Phone: (800) 737. 6040 Fax: (800) 825 5558 Website: www.idig.com Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Phone: (800) 737. 6040
Fax: (800) 825 5558
Website: 
Email: 
