Hours after the Oakland Raiders said Antonio Brown will indeed play in Monday's season opener, the star receiver posted a video on YouTube that showed a phone call he had with coach Jon Gruden amid his uncertain status with the team earlier this week.

In the video, which was posted Friday night and lasted 1 minute, 57 seconds, Brown is heard taking a call from Gruden, who asks the receiver: "What the hell is going on, man?"

Brown answered: "Just a villain all over the news, man."

Gruden then called Brown "the most misunderstood" person he has met, before asking him: "Do you want to be a Raider or not?"

Brown answered: "Man, I've been trying to be a Raider since Day 1. I've been f---ing working my ass off harder than anyone. I don't know why it's a question of me being a Raider. It's like do you guys want me to be a Raider?"

Gruden then asked the receiver to stop the off-the-field stuff and "just play football."

"How hard is that?" Gruden could be heard saying. "You're a great football player. Just play football."

Brown then told his coach it's not that simple.

"I'm more than just a football player, man," he said. "I'm a real person. I'm a real person. It ain't about the football, I know I can do that. I show you guys that on the daily. This is my life. Ain't no more games."

It wasn't immediately clear when the call between Brown and Gruden took place. A Raiders source told ESPN's Chris Mortensen that Gruden was truly amused by the video and even thought it was "awesome."

California's wiretapping law is a "two-party consent" law, making it a crime to record or eavesdrop on any confidential communication, including a private conversation or telephone call, without the consent of all parties to the conversation.

The video marked the latest chapter in the ongoing saga between Brown and the Raiders. Its posting came hours after Brown apologized publicly to his teammates and the Raiders organization after a confrontation he had Wednesday with general manager Mike Mayock that put his future with Oakland in doubt.

The confrontation, which a source told ESPN stemmed from Brown being unhappy he was fined for missing some of training camp and a walk-through, included the receiver calling Mayock a "cracker" and unleashing a barrage of "cuss words" at him, sources told ESPN. Brown later denied to ESPN's Dianna Russini that he used the word "cracker."

The exchange with Mayock put Brown's status with the Raiders in flux, with sources telling ESPN on Thursday that Oakland planned to suspend the receiver. Asked Thursday about the Brown situation, Gruden said he was "emotional about it."

"I think a lot of this guy," the coach said. "I think Antonio is a great receiver, and deep down I think he's a really good guy. So, I'm frustrated, I'm not going to say anything more about it, hope it all works out. But I don't have anything official to say about anything else until I get all the facts, and that's what I'm going to do."

On Friday, Gruden said Brown had returned to practice and was set to play in Monday's opener against the visiting Denver Broncos.

"Antonio is back today," Gruden said. "We're really excited about that. Ready to move on. He's had a lot of, obviously, time to think about things. We're happy to have him back, and I know Raider Nation is excited about that, too."

Brown was fined an unspecified amount for the confrontation with Mayock, ESPN's Ed Werder reported Friday night, and Brown is "not happy" about it, a team source told Werder.

Mayock did not speak to reporters Friday.

SPRINGFIELD, Mass. -- SuperSonics legend Jack Sikma, a driving force behind the franchise's only NBA title 40 years ago, pleaded with the league to bring back pro basketball to Seattle for the first time since 2008 during his Hall of Fame induction speech Friday night.

"To all the diehard Sonic fans who proudly sport the green and gold ... there's a hole in Seattle that needs to be filled," Sikma said at Symphony Hall, less than a mile from the Naismith Memorial Hall of Fame, into which Sikma became the 10th member of the Sonics to be enshrined.

"Speaking for all Sonics fans, it's our great hope that the NBA will soon find a pathway to bring a franchise back to Seattle. It's time."

The crowd erupted in agreement.

Businessman Clay Bennett relocated the Sonics to his hometown of Oklahoma City for the 2008-09 season after a squabble with the city of Seattle over a new arena. He took 20-year-old budding superstar Kevin Durant and a rich basketball history with him.

In 1979-80, the Sonics set a per-game attendance record of 21,725 that has since been broken.

That number has been reduced to zero over the past 11 seasons.

A new arena, with a reported price tag of more than $900 million, is being built on the plot of Seattle's old KeyArena. It will host an NHL expansion team for the 2021-22 season and, Sonics diehards hope, an NBA squad if and when the opportunity presents itself.

The return of the Sonics almost came to fruition earlier this decade, but the NBA's board of governors in 2013 denied the relocation request of Chris Hansen, one of the prospective owners, who was trying to buy the Sacramento Kings and move them to the Emerald City.

When it was in the Pacific Northwest, the franchise made a miracle run to the NBA Finals in 1978 after starting the season 5-17. Seattle would lose to the Washington Bullets in seven games. Seattle then hoisted its lone trophy in June 1979, exacting revenge on those Bullets -- winning in five games. Sikma averaged 15.8 points, 14.8 rebounds and 3.2 blocks in the series. In his speech, Sikma spoke proudly of the 1979 team's 40-year reunion earlier this year.

The eighth overall pick of the Sonics in 1977, Sikma was inducted into the Hall alongside Al Attles, Carl Braun, Chuck Cooper, Vlade Divac, Bill Fitch, Bobby Jones, Sidney Moncrief, the Tennessee A&I College teams from 1957-59, the Wayland Baptist University teams from 1948-82, Teresa Weatherspoon and Paul Westphal.

During his playing days -- nine seasons in Seattle and five in Milwaukee -- Sikma was a long-and-lean presence in the middle. The 6-foot-11 Sikma's signature behind-the-head jumper was nearly impossible to block and helped him average 16.8 points during his career with the Sonics, who retired his jersey in 1992. He's also the franchise's all-time leading rebounder.

But on this night, Sikma was the Sonics' biggest cheerleader.

NEW YORK -- Rafael Nadal found himself trailing in a tight first set against a bigger, younger opponent who was finding ways to cause trouble in their U.S. Open semifinal.

Never one to panic, never liable to have a letdown, Nadal hung tough, waited for 24th-seeded Matteo Berrettini to wilt ever so slightly and then pounced.

Nadal moved closer to a fourth US Open championship and 19th Grand Slam title overall -- one away from Roger Federer's record for men -- by pulling away for a 7-6 (6), 6-4, 6-1 victory over Berrettini under the roof at Arthur Ashe Stadium on Friday night.

The second-seeded Nadal was down 4-0, then 5-2, then 6-4 in the opening tiebreaker before taking the next four points and was on his way.

"You don't want to be in a tiebreak against a player like Matteo. ... I was a little bit lucky, no?" Nadal said. "I survived at that moment and ... after that, the match completely changed."

Sure did. Nadal broke once in the second set and three times in the third, while never facing a single break point in the match.

He will face No. 5 seed Daniil Medvedev of Russia on Sunday.

It is Medvedev's first major final, Nadal's 27th. They've played each other once before, the final of the Montreal Masters hard-court tournament in August, and Nadal won 6-3, 6-0.

"He's one of the more solid players on tour," Nadal said. "He is making steps forward every single week."

Medvedev advanced earlier Friday by beating Grigor Dimitrov 7-6 (5), 6-4, 6-3 for his tour-leading 50th win of the season.

The 23-year-old Russian first made a name for himself at the U.S. Open by earning the wrath of spectators. During his on-court interview Friday, Medvedev referenced his "tournament of controversies," which included accumulating $19,000 in fines and antagonizing booing fans last week, saying he knew it was "not going to be easy with the public."

Medvedev's tennis was a bit scratchy Friday, and like Nadal, he barely avoided dropping the opening set. But he did just enough with his mostly defensive style to get past Dimitrov, who had eliminated Federer in a five-set quarterfinal.

"I do think he was better player in first set. I do think I was kind of lucky to win it," Medvedev said about Dimitrov. "Then the momentum changed completely. I think after, I was playing better than him in the next two sets."

A year ago at this time, Nadal was retiring from his semifinal against Juan Martin del Potro because of knee pain. He's famously had trouble with his body over the years, particularly when it comes to less-forgiving hard courts, but right now, he sure looks healthy, hale and hungry as ever.

The 33-year-old Spaniard -- Federer, it's worth noting just turned 38 -- made it to the semifinals at every major this year. Nadal lost in the Australian Open final to Novak Djokovic in January, won a 12th French Open title in June, and lost to Federer in the final four at Wimbledon in July.

Berrettini, 23, had never been to a Grand Slam semifinal but didn't look intimidated early on against Nadal.

A decade apart, this was their first matchup, and so the early stages were as much a chance for Nadal to familiarize himself with the guy as it was for fans who might not know much about Berrettini.

What's obvious is that his strengths are a big serve that tops 130 mph and a forehand that can end points. Less apparent at first glance is Berrettini's touch, which he showed off with about a half-dozen drop shots to claim points in the first set, taking advantage of just how faaaaar behind the baseline Nadal stood to return.

As the match progressed, Nadal started going more to Berrettini's backhand, avoiding that furious forehand. So Berrettini adjusted, too, running around his backhand as much as possible to get in position to swing away from his preferred side.

And swing away he did, throwing his barrel-chested, 6-foot-5, 198-pound frame behind forehands that repeatedly approached 100 mph. Nothing subtle about them. Berrettini is built like a boxer and he often borrows terms from that sport when discussing his matches, such as when he spoke metaphorically about wearing down opponent Gael Monfils with body blows in their exhausting five-set quarterfinal.

The key to the opening set and, indeed, the entire semifinal, was that tiebreaker.

Berrettini grabbed a 4-0 lead, then kept getting closer to the finish line. At 6-4, there he stood, needing one point to take the set, as raucous supporters stood and yelled -- including the fellow Roman who owns a restaurant on Manhattan's Lower East Side where Berrettini has been going for pasta throughout the tournament.

That, then, is when Nadal needed to dig in, and did.

Berrettini? Unaccustomed to these stakes and these moments, he wasn't quite up to the task.

Nadal flicked a forehand passing shot that dipped enough to make Berrettini's volley try rather tough, and the ball found the net. One set point erased. On the next, Berrettini tried a drop shot, but this one was only so-so and it, too, landed in the net. A second set point was gone, and Berrettini covered his mouth.

The next two points -- the last of the set -- also went to Nadal via errors by Berrettini, a backhand into the net on a 24-stroke exchange, followed by a forehand that sailed long. Nadal reacted by shouting and pumping his fist repeatedly. Berrettini's jaw dropped. Fans rose and roared.

Berrettini hardly packed it in from there, but Nadal was simply better, grinding away until his foe finally succumbed. After Berrettini managed to save nine break points in a row, Nadal converted his 10th of the match to lead 4-3 in the second set.

Once that set was his, Nadal broke to go up 1-0 in the third. And that, folks, was that.

Soon enough, Nadal was able to move on from this test and start thinking about beating Medvedev -- and gaining on Federer.

"It means a lot," Nadal said, "to be back where I am today."

THIBODAUX, La. -- Maybe it was sharing a field with Peyton and Eli Manning that had LSU senior quarterback Joe Burrow feeling so confident. Or it might have been the throwing session he had with Sam Darnold a day earlier.

Or maybe, just maybe, Burrow knew something we didn't as he sat down with a group of reporters at the Manning Passing Academy in late June and started talking about how different the Tigers' offense had become.

"I don't think a lot of people are used to LSU scoring 40, 50, 60 points per game," he said, "and I think we have that capability."

The comment raised some eyebrows, to say the least, but Burrow didn't appear to be joking or saying it for shock value. If anything, he sounded excited to be part of something that hadn't been done before.

LSU potentially having a potent offense, and what that could mean for the SEC and the national college football conversation, had been one of the more interesting subplots of the offseason. With coach Ed Orgeron, his staff and Burrow, many pieces of the puzzle have been put into place to quell the skepticism.

Is it finally time to take LSU seriously?

The answer will come into greater focus when the Tigers travel to face Texas on Saturday (7:30 p.m. ET on ABC, ESPN App) after a convincing 55-3 victory in their opener against Georgia Southern.

Months earlier, during SEC media days in July, Orgeron seemed to acknowledge the doubters. Since taking over as head coach in 2016, he had hired former Broyles Award winner Matt Canada as offensive coordinator; Canada brought the spread and run-pass option to town for all of 15 minutes before it fell by the wayside. Replacing Canada with a more conservative playcaller, Steve Ensminger, led to a return under center and an offense that ranked 68th nationally in yards per game last season.

So when Orgeron took the stage to face the media, it was no surprise he got a little pushback when he talked about his latest staff addition, New Orleans Saints offensive assistant Joe Brady as passing game coordinator, and installing the spread. One reporter took the mic and said, point-blank, "You keep threatening to go to this upbeat spread offense, [like] a lot of schools -- I'm taking you at your word this time."

"It's in the playbook," Orgeron said. "So it's not a threat."

Brady installing the offense and Ensminger serving as the playcaller might sound like an awkward operation, but Burrow said it has had a positive impact on his game.

When the quarterback transferred to LSU from Ohio State in May 2018, he struggled like anyone else would with a similar move. He routinely got lost trying to find his apartment and couldn't come up with the names of more than 10 players on the team. Being from the Midwest, he wasn't used to the Southern summer heat lingering until December, and he lost weight because of it.

The game was unfamiliar, too. He hadn't taken a snap under center since the sixth grade. He had never taken a seven-step drop and had to learn how in about a month and a half. Managing the offense, he helped the Tigers beat Auburn and Georgia, but he threw for 300 yards in a game only once during the regular season (against Rice) and oversaw an offense that didn't score a single point against Alabama.

Heading into Year 2 at LSU, Burrow said he feels more comfortable in Baton Rouge. He traded his long hair for a buzz cut to better manage the heat and can now tell you who his teammates are. The game is also familiar again, thanks in part to Brady's arrival, as Orgeron has charged the co-coordinator with bringing a 21st-century offense to the unit, complete with the shotgun, the spread and even the run-pass option.

When we met with Burrow at the Manning Passing Academy earlier in the summer, he was already saying how fired up he was to play Texas -- Longhorns coach Tom Herman, who recruited Burrow to Ohio State, would be on the opposite sideline. It was shaping up to be a "special season," Burrow said. He believed the Tigers could have one of the best offenses in college football.

"It's going to be a lot different," Burrow said. "I'll try not to tell you how different it's going to be."

Burrow was guarded about the details, other than to say to watch what little LSU revealed during the spring game. He pumped up his receivers on how they'd get the ball in open space and added that the running backs would become a threat in the passing game. The offense would be explosive, where "that hasn't always been the case in the past," he said.

And with Burrow in "Joe's type of offense," where he can be a dual threat and run the ball, Orgeron expects fireworks. Fans and skeptics alike got a glimpse during the season opener in Baton Rouge. Against Georgia Southern, the Tigers opened up in the shotgun with three receivers and one tight end. The running back, who began by Burrow's side, motioned out of the backfield to set up -- gasp! -- an empty formation. The pass ended in an incompletion, but it was one of only four all day from Burrow.

When Burrow completed his first pass moments later, it took only 10 seconds before he was snapping the ball again. The offense was moving so fast at times that Burrow actually barked at the referees for not letting the Tigers snap the ball as quickly as they'd like. There were bunch formations and RPOs, and the Tigers even went into the shotgun inside on first-and-goal inside the 5-yard line. They barely huddled. It was positively un-LSU-like. Burrow had said to expect 40 points per game, and LSU had that before halftime. Burrow completed 24 of 27 passes (to more than 10 players) for 278 yards, five touchdowns and no interceptions.

After the game, Burrow joked about his "40, 50, 60 points" comment and how he "took some heat" for it.

"Hopefully we can keep building on this thing," he told reporters. "I wanted 60 tonight."

It took a decade for LSU to earn the reputation as an offensive black hole, so Burrow knows one game isn't going to change everyone's minds.

"It was nice," he said of the offense's debut, "but, at the end of the day, it was Game 1 and we have 11 games left. We could tank the final 11 games and everyone would be right back bashing us."

Ahead of Saturday's prime-time game against Texas, he said the offense needs to clean up short-yardage situations, which he estimated took 14-21 points off the board against Georgia Southern. The offensive line held up well in the opener, but the Longhorns have much more talent up front. On top of that, going on the road and playing in a raucous DKR-Texas Memorial Stadium will make communication difficult. Orgeron said there might be some checks they just can't use in that environment.

Burrow said he expects an array of blitzes and different looks meant to confuse him; he will have to watch out for Caden Sterns, whom Orgeron called "one of the best safeties we're going to see."

If LSU does find a way to win, it could land in the thick of the playoff hunt. "I'm fired up about it," Burrow said. "We have our work cut out for us."

ESPN reporter Edward Aschoff contributed to this report.

Week 1 of the college football season exceeded last year's opening weekend from the perspective of drama, wacky finishes, funky bounces and by just about any other measure. Week 2 likely will be defined by the outcome of two Saturday games: No. 12 Texas A&M at No. 1 Clemson (3:30 p.m. ET, ABC) and No. 6 LSU at No. 9 Texas (7:30 p.m. ET, ABC).

Between recent recruiting battles and bitterness stemming from LSU's last coaching search, the Tigers and Longhorns have grown to dislike each other quite a bit. It's a perfect time for them to start a series on the field. (Texas visits Baton Rouge in 2020.)

Burgeoning rivalry or not, this is a hell of a matchup on the field. Here are the four biggest questions I've got for how this game might play out.

1. Who handles the conditions?

The temperature in Austin likely will approach 100 degrees on Saturday. That opens the door for fatigue to play a role, as it did for Florida State against Boise State. In humid, 90-degree conditions, the Seminoles slowly wilted against BSU's tempo-heavy, quick-strike passing game.

In terms of game clock, BSU averaged 22.9 seconds per snap against FSU in Week 1. Texas, meanwhile, averaged 22.8 against Louisiana Tech and attempted a similarly high percentage of short passes.

Twenty-three of Sam Ehlinger's 38 passes were thrown within 6 yards of the line of scrimmage, including a heavy diet early in the contest; he not only completed 21 of these throws, but despite minimal air yardage, those completions gained 146 yards (7 per catch). Five of the completions ended up gaining 13 yards or more. The Horns were efficient enough in the short passing game to both move the chains and preoccupy the safeties, opening up a few downfield opportunities in later quarters.

Having receivers who can block really well has turned into one of college football's most underrated and useful luxuries, but blocking LSU's defensive backs and linebackers is different than blocking Louisiana Tech's. The Tigers allowed only 5 yards per completion on passes thrown behind the line last season -- they allowed only 6.8 on passes thrown within 10 yards of the line.

Texas' short passing game could be the most important factor Saturday. The Longhorns might not be able to run the ball efficiently, both because LSU's defensive front is awesome and because, thanks to injuries, the UT running back corps consists of basically Keaontay Ingram and a bunch of dudes who moved from other positions. Since this is a big game, it's safe to assume Ehlinger will be prepared to carry the ball 15 to 20 times himself, but LSU's run front might be the best Texas has faced under Herman.

That puts extra pressure on Devin Duvernay, Collin Johnson & Co. to take those horizontal passes and average 7 or 8 yards per catch off of them. If they can do that, the Horns can both move the ball efficiently and potentially wear the Tigers down. What do you suppose wears linebackers down faster -- having to fight off a blocker to make a tackle in the box or having to sprint from sideline to sideline ad nauseam?

2. Can Texas create some big plays?

Of course, the quickest route to the end zone is via the big play. Ehlinger threw a couple of lovely balls downfield against a stressed Tech secondary, but however you want to frame the big-play matchup, it favors LSU.

The Tigers defense, led by safety Grant Delpit, ranked 18th in my marginal explosiveness measure last year, and the Texas offense ranked 116th. The Horns ranked 77th in gains of 30-plus yards, and what LSU allowed ranked 23rd. If the short pass isn't working, the Horns might have to look for some shortcuts, and they are rarely found against defensive coordinator Dave Aranda's attack.

3. Can LSU avoid going backward?

LSU's first go-round in its new spread-ish offense was an obvious success. The Tigers destroyed Georgia Southern's not-completely-awful defense to the tune of 42 first-half points and an absurd 68% success rate, filtering out garbage time. (The national average for success rate is generally around 43%.)

Beyond the results, it actually looked different. LSU was foregoing huddles and seemingly allowing the defensive formation -- namely, the number of defenders in the box -- to determine runs versus passes. Joe Burrow threw a downright Ehlingerian 20 passes within 6 yards of the line of scrimmage. (He completed 18 for 189 yards, including two touchdowns and a 44-yard catch-and-run by Justin Jefferson.) There was a heavy mix of both quick strikes to wideouts and checkdowns/screens to running backs.

Better yet, the spread-out formations opened things up for the run game: 15 non-garbage-time rushes garnered a 67% success rate. Whereas LSU was high on the manball factor in previous years -- Eight defenders in the box? Who cares? Let's outmuscle 'em for 3 yards! -- the Tigers did an intriguing job of putting the ball where defenders weren't on Saturday.

Some of the same questions about the short strikes and their effectiveness against stronger, faster defenders apply to LSU's offense as to Texas'. But there was one glitch in an otherwise effective attack that got my attention: negative plays.

Georgia Southern defenders finished the game with 12 havoc plays (seven tackles for loss and five pass breakups). (A havoc play is a tackle for loss, pass intercepted or broken up, or a forced fumble. Havoc rate is those combined divided by total plays). That's a 17% havoc rate, and while a lot of that happened in garbage time, not all of it did. The Tigers also allowed a 17% havoc rate last season, which ranked 85th in FBS.

Texas' defense managed an 18% havoc rate last season and was at 18% against Louisiana Tech. If someone's moving backward or getting passes batted, it's probably LSU.

4. Can LSU match Texas' (likely) A-game?

Here's something I wrote in my Texas preview this summer:

Herman is the ultimate big-game coach. In four years as a head coach, he is 10-6 straight-up as an underdog and 13-2-1 against the spread. As a one-possession favorite, he's 9-2 straight-up and 7-3-1 against the spread. As a healthy favorite, however? He's 21-5 straight-up (a worse win percentage than as a one-score favorite) and 8-17-1 against the spread.

Texas is a six-point underdog, and the next time a Herman team doesn't play well as an underdog will be nearly the first. LSU plays better as an underdog, too. The Tigers were 7-1 against the spread as an underdog in 2017-18 but were just 8-8 as a favorite.

Any trend information like this is based on small samples, but it's safe to say that Texas is going to play really good football. Will LSU match it, or will the Tigers fall victim to first-half bum-rushes the same way Oklahoma (24-3 run) and Georgia (17-0 run) did in losses to Texas last season? The answer could determine the outcome of maybe the most important game of the week.

A quick thought on attendance

College football attendance was at a 22-year low in 2018. You've probably heard lots of reasons for this. The Wi-Fi is bad, the stadiums are old, televisions are bigger and cheaper, the cost of attending a game is rising, there are more cupcake games than there used to be. All are true, to some degree.

However, one other factor could either drive another drop or prevent a rebound this year: continued mediocrity from Tennessee, USC and Florida State.

No, really!

It is worth mentioning, however, that attendance isn't falling everywhere. Comparing home attendance in 2018 to the averages from 2005 to 2017, 50 FBS teams were higher in the former than the latter, and 27 more fell by less than 2,000 fans per game. Things are tilting in the wrong direction, obviously, but at only a slight angle.

In reality, a handful of schools have driven the averages down for everybody.

1. Fallen blue-bloods. From 2005 to 2017, five schools -- Florida, Florida State, Tennessee, UCLA and USC -- averaged 82,902 per game in home attendance. In 2018, they averaged 70,472. Only one of these storied programs (Florida) reached bowl eligibility.

In particular, USC's attendance has plummeted to crisis levels: 91,480 in 2006; 87,945 in 2012; 68,459 in 2016; 55,449 in 2018.

2. Increasingly bad power conference programs. Five more Power 5 schools -- Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Oregon State and Rutgers -- have either become catastrophically bad, made awkward conference changes, or, in Rutgers' case, both.

3. The left behind. Six mid-major programs in particular -- BYU, ECU, Hawai'i, New Mexico, UConn, and UTEP -- have been somewhat left behind in recent years, either because of on-field struggles, bad hires, conference realignment or a combination thereof.

4. MIZ-ZZZZZZ. For the first four games of 2015, Missouri averaged 68,067 per game in home attendance. An on-field collapse drove numbers down, and the November 2015 protests divided the fan base in ways that have yet to be fully addressed. Attendance fell by 20% in 2016 and has since slipped further, even as the team has rebounded.

5. Stragglers. Arizona State, Arkansas, California, Minnesota and North Carolina were either terrible in 2018 or are rebounding from a recent malaise. Stanford regressed in terms of both quality and entertainment value last season. Vanderbilt hosted neither Georgia nor Alabama in 2018. Air Force and Southern Miss are mid-major attendance stalwarts that struggled.

I just listed 26 teams. They account for all of the attendance debt.

Now, there is obviously a major element of "If you remove all the bad, everything's good!!" in this exercise. This wasn't intended to be a rigorous, scientific exercise. Still, you can boil FBS' attendance issues down to only about a quarter of FBS.

If Florida State, Tennessee, UCLA and USC were to all rebound to some degree in 2019, that might be all it takes for FBS' overall attendance to improve over 2018 totals. Of course, those teams went 1-3 in Week 1, and the team that won lost its starting quarterback to injury. That's not encouraging.

Week 2 playlist

Here are 10 games -- at least one from each weekend time slot -- that you should pay attention to if you want to get the absolute most out of the weekend, from both an information and entertainment perspective.

All times Eastern

Friday night
Marshall at Boise State (9 p.m., ESPN2)
With no Thursday night games this week, here's your pre-Saturday showcase game. BSU and new quarterback Hank Bachmeier did what they were projected to do against Florida State and came away with a win in Tallahassee, but Marshall is a sturdy 51st in SP+ and always boasts some of the best overall athleticism in the Group of 5. This one's very much worth your time.
SP+ projection: Boise State 39, Marshall (+11) 29

Early Saturday
Cincinnati at Ohio State (noon, ABC)
I doubt Cincinnati has the offensive firepower to scare the Buckeyes, but the Bearcats definitely have the defense to test Justin Fields. OSU's quarterback had a pretty much perfect start against FAU last week, but the Bearcats ranked second in my passing marginal efficiency measure last season and frustrated the daylights out of another blue-chip sophomore, UCLA's Dorian Thompson-Robinson, last week.
SP+ projection: OSU 34, UC (+16) 19

Army at Michigan (noon, Fox)
Remember last season, when Army nearly beat Oklahoma on pay-per-view? Might there be a repeat blue-blood scare this time around? Possibly, but only if Army's offense functions better than it did last week, when a well-prepared Rice team almost pulled an upset in West Point. One assumes Michigan has too much offense and athleticism here, but one assumed that in the OU game last season, too.
SP+ projection: Michigan (-22.5) 45, Army 20

Saturday afternoon
Texas A&M at Clemson (3:30 p.m., ABC)
The other huge game of the week gets the afternoon shift mostly to itself. I named A&M's Kellen Mond the most important player of the 2019 season, both because of his potential and the number of upset opportunities A&M has on its ridiculous schedule. Well, here comes Upset Chance No. 1. Can he outplay Clemson sophomore/golden god Trevor Lawrence, who, it bears mentioning, looked awfully rusty last week against Georgia Tech?
SP+ projection: Clemson 37, Texas A&M (+17.5) 24

Nebraska at Colorado (3:30 p.m. Fox)
It bears mentioning that Colorado looked quite a bit better than the Huskers last week, doesn't it? Granted, Colorado State might not be that much (if any) of an upgrade over South Alabama, but the Buffaloes pulled away from the Rams in the second half of a 52-31 win, and the Huskers needed three return scores (not the most sustainable way to make a living) to keep South Alabama at arm's length. SP+ has these teams dead even, with home-field advantage making the difference.
SP+ projection: CU (+3.5) 42, NU 40

Saturday evening (besides LSU-Texas)
Miami at North Carolina (8 p.m., ACC Network)
Manny Diaz gets a shot at revenge of sorts over Mack Brown for his 2013 firing as Texas defensive coordinator. But while you figure he'd love to run the score up, he should probably be happy with a win of any kind, huh? UNC confused the hell out of South Carolina's Jake Bentley last week and could do the same to the Canes' Jarren Williams.
SP+ projection: Miami (-5.5) 30, UNC 23

Deep cut: North Texas at SMU. North Texas' Mason Fine destroyed Abilene Christian (as one would have hoped he would) in Week 1, and former Texas quarterback Shane Buechele enjoyed a prolific debut (30-for-49 for 360 yards) in SMU's 37-30 win over Arkansas State. It's usually worth watching when two strains of the Air Raid battle it out, and we should learn quite a bit about North Texas' preparedness for a C-USA title run.
SP+ projection: SMU 40, North Texas (+3.5) 39

Saturday late shift
Cal at Washington (10:30 p.m., FS1)
Plenty of Power 5 teams struggled with FBS opponents last week -- Cal, to name one! -- but Washington wasn't one of them. The Huskies trounced a typically solid Eastern Washington squad 47-14, and Jacob Eason went 27-for-36 for 349 yards and four scores in his debut. Now comes maybe the toughest defense (and, uh, weakest offense) UW will face all season. Can Eason do what Jake Browning couldn't last year and avoid a Golden Bears upset?
SP+ projection: UW (-14) 40, Cal 19

Stanford at USC (10:30 p.m. ESPN)
USC quarterback JT Daniels is lost for the season. Stanford QB KJ Costello and star tackle Walker Little are both out. This is not quite the game we thought we'd see, and lines have been hard to come by. Still, we get Graham Harrell's USC offense -- led instead by freshman Kedon Slovis -- against a Stanford defense that absolutely erased Northwestern a week ago. Winner leads the Pac-12 (at 1-0, sure, but go with it).
SP+ projection: USC 27 (-1 or so), Stanford 23.

Andy Lapthorne lost in his second quad wheelchair singles round-robin match at the US Open as Australian Dylan Alcott came from behind to win.

Alcott, who beat the Briton to win the Wimbledon title in July, prevailed 0-6 7-6 (7-3) 6-3 in New York.`

Lapthorne defeated David Wagner on Thursday and will play American Bryan Barten in his final round-robin match.

The top two after the completion of the round-robin tournament will advance to Sunday's final.

Lapthorne will also team up with Alcott in Saturday's quad doubles final, having won together at Wimbledon.

Elsewhere at Flushing Meadows, defending champion Alfie Hewett's wheelchair singles quarter-final against Japanese second seed Shingo Kunieda was suspended because of the poor weather in New York on Friday, with the Briton leading 4-1 in the first set.

WATKINS GLEN, N.Y. – With the Trans-Am Series presented by Pirelli TA2 season winding down, every lap matters, even in qualifying.

The TA2 presented by AEM class drivers felt that urgency on Friday afternoon as the field of American muscle machines were flat out from the drop of the green flag.

By the time the checkered flag flew on the 20-minute session, the top-five drivers were only separated by seven tenths of a second with the front three rows claimed by a mix of  TA2 class veterans and rookies.

Not only fighting against his competitors, Rafa Matos was also fighting off an illness, but the defending champion didn’t let that keep him down as he captured his fourth pole of the 2019 season. Driving the No. 88 3Dimensional Services Group Chevrolet Camaro, Matos was able to  eclipse TA2 points leader Marc Miller by seven hundredths of a second with a fast time of 1:51.197 seconds on his third flying lap.

“I had a rough night trying to recover from this sickness,” Matos said. “We are doing everything we can to recover points from Marc (Miller). We are getting better every day. Every point counts. We need to get pole position point, the fastest lap of the race point and the win, all while hoping that Marc doesn’t have a good result, but this thing is far from over.”

Feeling the pressure from other drivers right from the start, Miller in the No. 40 Prefix/Stevens-Miller Racing Dodge Challenger drove hard from the green to the checkered in qualifying, but stayed focused on the big picture to claim another front row start, just 0.070 of a second adrift of Matos.

“Qualifying is one of those times where we should be spread out and not around each other, but today that just wasn’t the case,” Miller explained. “I got passed more in qualifying than I did in any of the three sessions just on the out lap. Things got a little haywire out there. Guys were really trying to push themselves and the track limits.  While a lot of the guys were racey, we were a little bit more methodical and got a couple good laps in and were just shy of pole position.”

The 2016 NASA Eastern States Spec Miata National Champion Tyler Kicera is making his professional motorsports debut  in TA2 class competition, wheeling the No. 4 Carbotech Brakes Kicera Motorsports Ford Mustang. While Kicera is new to the TA2 class, he has a lot of experience on the 3.4-mile, 11-turn circuit. Kicera claimed the track record at Watkins Glen in a Spec Miata on his way to his 2016 title.

Kicera’s first outing in TA2 was bittersweet. The Pennsylvania-native set the third fastest time of the day on the opening lap with a time of 1:51.500-seconds, but incidental contact with another car in Lap 2 wrecked his front end and his chance of taking pole.

“The opening lap was pretty full on,” said Kicera. “I thought we would go out and warm the car, but the other guys ahead of me kind of went, so I figured I probably needed to follow suit being the new guy. I got a really good first lap in and then got mixed up with some people, and ruined my shot at pole. It’s frustrating that we sit P3 on the grid and have to spend a lot of time this evening to try to make the race tomorrow.”

Sharing second row is another top contender, Thomas Merrill. Returning to the No. 81 Skip Barber Ford Mustang, Merrill slid into a P4 start his first time driving the Big Diehl Racing prepared TA2 car at Watkins Glen.

“These things are awesome to drive around Watkins Glen,” Merrill said. “This place is super fast, super smooth and flying these things through the chicane is a special experience.”

Scott Lagasse Jr. in the No. 92 SLR/Fields Racing/M1 Racecars Chevrolet Camaro rounded out the top five.

Outfitted in a BC Race Car, 17-year-old Kent Vaccaro made his mark in the TA2 class, driving the No. 25 BC Race Cars Chevrolet Camaro. Piloting a car with a roof for the first time, the open-wheel young gun finished just outside the top-five in sixth place with a fast time of 1:52.302.

“It was a tremendous day,” Vaccaro beamed after his first qualifying session. “I got comfortable with the car pretty quickly. My coach told me today to lick the stamp and send it, and that’s exactly what we did. BC Race Cars gave me a fast car this weekend, and I was able to showcase that in qualifying. I’m used to running open wheel cars for around 30-minutes per session. The heat and extended track time in the car are things that I’ve had to get used to, but the Cool Shirt really makes a difference.”

NASCAR K&N Pro Series East driver Ty Gibbs session was cut short after breaking a right lower ball joint on his No. 26 Mike Cope Racing machine entering the first turn of The Loop, placing him in Row 4 for Saturday’s 100-mile race.

“Breaking the ball joint ruined our qualifying session,” Gibbs said. “We only got two laps in and will start seventh. Mike Cope Racing gave me a really good car and we will kill it in the race tomorrow.”