April means anxiety for college applicants. It is the month when admissions offices send out acceptance and rejection letters. Admissions anxiety escalated early this year when, in March, national media focused on the Varsity Blues scandal in which the FBI found evidence of bribery and admissions fraud at Georgetown University, Stanford University, the University of Southern California, the University of Texas and Yale University.

Athletics was the “side door” that unscrupulous consultants used to help create fake all-stars to gain admission to prestigious colleges, especially in sports characterized as elite or privileged. The scheme became the admissions version of the Great Train Robbery. According to The New York Times, “The ruse was oddly simple. Since college coaches can often recommend more athletes to the admissions department than a team needs, why not buy a few slots from the coaches and sell them to parents desperate to get their children into the most selective universities?”

The Times reporters’ explanation generated more heat than light because it ran counter to the customary uses and abuses of athletics in college admissions. The traditional scandal was an ambitious coach who tried to enroll a talented athlete who did not have adequate high school grades and test scores. With the Varsity Blues cases, however, some coaches and athletic officials accepted bribes to advocate admission of an applicant who offered little as either an athlete or a student.

To show how this scheme contrasts with conventional procedures used to monitor academics and athletics in admissions, it’s useful to look at one conference and its colleges. For example, the Ivy League and its eight members are a significant case because they play in the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s Division I and their academic standards for admission are high.

The athletic admissions scam was surprising because few college coaches, including those in the Ivy League, have the luxury of recommending more athletes for admission than a team needs. The opposite is usually the case -- coaches must negotiate for a number of slots. This may be determined in part by NCAA limits on squad size or limits on allowable grants in aid and/or by a conference. “Stockpiling” of extra athletic admits for a team is rare because it means coaches from other sports probably are required to reduce their quota of recommendations for admits. In the Ivy League, each sport has a limit on the number of recruited athletes it is allowed. Football, for example, is allowed an average of 30 student athletes per admitted class.

At academically selective colleges, coaches face another internal hurdle. They must persuade the president, the provost, admissions officers and the athletics director that their particular sport warrants admissions spaces. Any admissions slots given to a coach would take away available slots from other student activities.

Why, for example, should a tennis coach be given five admissions recruits per year when directors of performing arts are also vying for talented recruits? It is a high-stakes deliberation and zero-sum game defined by strict limits on entering class size. To make the trade-offs even more complicated, every admissions slot dedicated to a talented student athlete could mean one less space for a nonmerit admit, such as an alumni legacy or the child of a generous donor.

These deliberations make admission of student athletes complex and competitive. For the Ivy League, it is a three-dimensional chess game. A crucial document for defining the rules of the game is the Academic Index, commonly known as the “AI.”

The AI and other selectivity measures mean that coaches are usually required to make recommendations for admitting recruited athletes within strict academic guidelines. In the Ivy League, a recruit must be within the bands of proximity to the overall profile of admitted students according to grades and SAT scores. If not, faculty complain about overemphasis. The coach and the admissions committee may go beneath the bands but usually only for a very talented and exceptional athlete. And any exception to the composite index must be compensated by having other recruits who are above the academic norms. In the case of the Ivy League, the scrutiny takes place within the institution and also is subjected to review by coaches and faculty representatives across the conference.

This latter provision means that the AI promotes “honor among thieves” within the coaching ranks of the Ivy League. They all know the rosters and data of their rivals and can raise objections. The wrestling team at Princeton University, for example, cannot have a composite AI that is out of whack with the norms for all student athletes in the conference or against the profile of Princeton’s entering class. The two-pronged objective is to build a floor of academic eligibility of athletes across all teams compared to the profile of member universities and, at the same time, discourage any coach from being a vagabond who chronically recruits student athletes whose academic records are egregiously subpar.

Another complication is that the Ivy League is distinctive among conferences in NCAA Division I in that it prohibits athletics grants in aid. Scholarship awards without loans are generous, but they are need-based and open to all applicants. There are no special funds for recruited athletes. Consider a situation in which the coach of Harvard University’s women’s soccer team is competing with Stanford and Northwestern University to recruit a high school senior who is a nationally acclaimed goalkeeper. She has high SAT scores and a 3.9 grade point average, yet her family income indicates that she does not qualify for need-based financial aid. Since athletic grants in aid are not need-based, Stanford and Northwestern can each offer her a full scholarship worth about $65,000 per year, whereas Harvard and other Ivy League institutions cannot award her any financial aid.

The peculiarities of Ivy League athletics and admissions surfaced in another recent article in The New York Times, as reporters noted, “The scandal has raised questions about whether such athletic preferences are fair -- or even necessary.” This then led to one high-profile college admissions counselor to tell reporters, “Ivy League and sports, to me that’s an oxymoron.”

This characterization of the Ivy League and sports was intriguing but not convincing for very long. In the same day’s issue of the Times, the headline story of the sports section was about American figure skating champion Nathan Chen, who is an undergraduate at Yale. Turning to the third page of the same sports section, another Times article reported that Bella Alarie “became a must-see player for the Princeton women’s basketball team” and is “looking to make an unusual leap from the Ivy League” to an extended career in the WNBA.

One can add to these selected biographical profiles of student athletes some statistics. The record books in recent years show Ivy League teams winning national championships in several sports, including men’s lacrosse, women’s soccer, men’s ice hockey, men’s crew and women’s crew. Cornell University’s wrestling team are consistently among the strongest in the nation. Ivy League student athletes include numerous individual champions in several sports, including wrestling and swimming, along with alumni who qualify to compete on Olympic squads.

In response to the rhetorical question in The New York Times as to whether athletic preferences are fair or necessary, the Ivy League represents a deliberate model to show that intercollegiate athletics are important. The conference sponsors 35 varsity sports. Harvard, for example, offers 42 varsity sports -- the most of any university in the NCAA. Reliance on the Academic Index indicates an approach with the intent to assure that this substantial commitment to sports stays within bounds academically.

But the AI operates on the presumption that a coach seeks admission for student athletes who will contribute to a winning team and also be academically suitable within the campus. As suggested by the scandal of recent weeks, these measures cannot guard against a coach or athletic official who literally plays by different rules using illegal acts to pursue other, dubious goals.

A side effect of the recent scandals has been allusion to the privileged character of many nonrevenue sports such as crew and squash that the Ivy League and other conferences offer. One partial reform for sports that are tilted toward affluent students might be to follow the example of Trinity University, a collegiate squash power, which has established a squash developmental program and league for elementary and high school students in the community, drawing from all family income groups. It has led numerous participants to receive athletic scholarships for squash.

Some of the media criticisms about allegedly elite sports seem wrongheaded. When the University of Southern California was charged with using its varsity crew team as a convenient place for fraudulent admits, college rowers elsewhere felt betrayed and perplexed by USC’s actions. The culture of intercollegiate crew is one of dedication and sacrifice, with few commercial rewards.

Furthermore, college crew coaches ranging from the University of Washington and the University of California, Berkeley, on the Pacific coast, extending to the University of Wisconsin and on to Harvard are resourceful in identifying raw talent from the ranks of high school swimmers and basketball players who may never have rowed prior to enrolling in college. One can find elaboration on this in such accounts as David Halberstam’s The Last Amateurs or in Daniel James Brown’s The Boys in the Boat.

The Ivy League’s decision to sponsor a large number of varsity sports includes a commitment to trying to fulfill gender equity in student activities. It shows how a conference can change to accept the letter and spirit of Title IX, especially after one Ivy institution faced a serious legal challenge in the courts when it cut some women’s varsity teams.

The Ivy League is not the Big Ten, nor is it the Atlantic Coast Conference, the Pac-12 or the Southeastern Conference. Within the NCAA, each conference and college must establish its own philosophy of how academics and athletics are to coexist. At very least, the Ivy League presidents and admissions officers have worked, and should continue to work, with coaches and faculty members to operationalize their ideas and ideals as part of the high stakes of selective college admissions.

Neither the structures nor strategies are static. As such, they are open to review and reform as new problems and prospects surface. About 10 years ago, presidents at several Ivy League universities considered eliminating some sports, such as varsity wrestling. And, of course, university presidents and all constituencies can and should discuss what is appropriate allocation of admissions recommendations for varsity sports as part of the educational mission.

In addition, the Ivy League administrators may wish to consider measures that will prevent the kinds of abuses uncovered in the past month that used athletics as an unethical and illegal means to gain admissions advantages. But such concerns should be dealt with in an informed, open forum and based on institutional goals and priorities. To dismiss varsity sports and the Academic Index out of hand as expendable and archaic is to overlook the heritage and promise of a sound scholar-athlete program as central, not peripheral, to the Ivy League undergraduate experience.

Securing a fifth-place finish at team nationals, the Yale men’s squash team erased memories of a below par 2017-18 campaign with a resurgent 2018-19 season.

The Bulldogs (10–5, 4–3 Ivy) climbed five spots in nationals this year and returned to play in the Potter Cup after a one-year absence. In the past five years, Yale has fluctuated from being national champions in 2016 to falling to 10th in 2018, so the 2018–19 season helped stabilize Yale and set the foundation for a bright future.

“From the very first practice of the year there was a shift in the team mentality towards professionalism. Moving up five spots, from tenth to fifth, is a really big jump in this league,” captain Jay Losty ’19 said. “As for next year, I am really excited to see where the team can go. We have some really solid recruits coming in next year, and I think that if everyone on the team continues to buy into the idea of training with professionalism, the team will do really well next season.”

Even after national championships, Yale continued to shine individually. No. 1 Spencer Lovejoy ’20 bested his opponents eight out of 13 times in the regular season. Six of these wins came in three-game sweeps, and Lovejoy went on to compete in Division A of the College Squash Association’s Individual Championships. In his third trip to the championships, Lovejoy bested his first two opponents — including Columbia’s Velavan Senthilkumar, who was ranked No. 3 in the tournament and who had previously defeated Lovejoy twice in season — before falling to Harvard’s Victor Crouin in the semifinals. With these results, Lovejoy became the first Yale representative to reach the Division A semifinals in 16 years.

No. 2 Nadav Raziel ’22, No. 3 Harrison Gill ’21 and No. 4 Calvin McCafferty ’20 accompanied Lovejoy to the Individual Championships and represented Yale in the B Division. Raziel fell in the semifinals after McCafferty fell in the first round. Gill fell in B Division South’s championship game, marking the end of the team’s postseason play.

The Bulldogs witnessed major growth throughout their season. Yale suffered a deafening 9–0 loss against Columbia in early February but received the opportunity to avenge itself against the Lions in the battle for fifth-place overall in team nationals. In a nail biting afternoon, McCafferty clinched the necessary win in five games to take down Columbia in a massive 5–4 result. As a team that has experienced both glory and disappointment in recent seasons, the resilience demonstrated in this game spoke to the renewed strength of this team.

“We ended the season on a high note, which was great in the moment and beneficial for our progress moving forward,” Gill said. “The win reinforced in us the confidence to continue the training that has greatly improved everyone’s performance this past season.” 

The Elis now say goodbye to their three seniors — Losty, Yohan Pandole ’19 and Jonathan Kovac ’19 — whose leadership roles will be filled by the remaining three juniors on the team.

Yale’s fifth-place finish marks a new page for the team. With many of the players expressing individual consistency and the general improvement trend apparent, future success within Yale’s squash program is not far from reach.

“Everyone bought into the themes of professionalism and hard work, and we put in a lot of work as a team together,” Lovejoy said. “I am excited to build on the things that worked for next season and implement some new things to bring us to the next level. If we can do this, there’s no reason why we can’t jump another five spots.”

The Yale men’s squash team has been led by head coach David Talbott since 1983.

Lauren Cueto | This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 

Netherlands’ World No.31 Milou van der Heijden will be one of the home favourites in action when the DPD Open Squash takes place in Eindhoven from April 9-14.

The PSA World Tour Gold tournament will host 48 of the best male and female players when they descend on the Dutch city next month to battle it out for the titles.

The tournament will be held at the new DPD headquarters in Eindhoven to mark the grand opening of their new distribution centre and will feature a total prize fund of $212,000 split equally between the men’s and women’s draws. Home hope van der Heijden can’t wait to see squash come back to the Netherlands.

“I’m very pleased,” said Dutch No.1 van der Heijden.

“Obviously for me to play in the event, but also for the Dutch squash fans it is very exciting to have such strong draws in both events. I think it’s going to be a great week.

“Everyone has been talking about it for a while, so it's exciting that it is almost here now.”

The last time a major squash tournament was held in the Netherlands was the 2011 PSA World Championships in Rotterdam and 28-year-old van der Heijden – who resides in Eindhoven – is looking forward to performing in front of her home crowd once again.

“The last time I played a PSA tournament in the Netherlands was qualification of the World Championships in Rotterdam back in 2011, so that is a long time ago. I think this will be completely different, as I now get to play on the glass court in such a great venue.

“I’m sure it’s going to be a great experience and I hope the crowd will get behind me, like other home crowds do at other tournaments.”

Van der Heijden recently captured her biggest PSA title to date after she defeated France’s Coline Aumard in the final of the Annecy Rose Open and she says she is hoping to carry that winning momentum into next week’s tournament.

“Winning at the Annecy Rose was great, I played well during that tournament. That is definitely the momentum I’m trying to keep going. Every tournament is different though, but winning a tournament never hurts your confidence I think.”

The Dutch player will begin her tournament against England’s World No.22 Millie Tomlinson in round one, with van der Heijden getting the better of her English opponent earlier this season at the Oracle NetSuite Open in San Francisco.

“Me and Millie have been playing each other since juniors. We’ve had some battles, so, this time will be no different.

“Millie is strong all around and has been playing well. I will need to be on top of my game and see where it can take me.”

Van der Heijden will be joined in the draw by women's wildcard Tessa ter Sluis and Roshan Bharos, who takes the wildcard spot in the men's event.

Opening round matches of the DPD Open will be played on Tuesday April 9 at a purposely built squash arena at the DPD premises and at Squashtime, a 15-court facility in Eindhoven, which is the home of Dutch National Champion van der Heijden. From April 10-14 all matches will be played on the glass court.

Tickets for the DPD Open are available for purchase through Ticketmaster.

For more information, follow the tournament on Facebook and Instagram or visit the event's website.

Liu Kwai-chi (right) and Manuel Chan Gassmann

The Macau Squash Open is returning from April 10 to 14 with a strong line-up of athletes from 17 countries and regions competing for the USD50,000 prize and title.

This year’s tournament is the 8th edition and the matches will be part of the Professional Squash Association (PSA) World Tour Bronze, which is one of the top-ranking tournaments on the circuit.

According to William Kuan Vai-lam, chairman of the organizing committee, the tournament will bring together 48 players from 17 countries and regions, including Egypt, Peru, India, Japan, and Hong Kong.

The line-up includes title defenders and some of the world’s best players. There is Diego Elias, ranked ninth in the world from Peru; Saurav Ghosal, ranked 12 from India; Omar Mosaad, third seed of the tournament; and Yip Tsz-fung, defending champion from Hong Kong.

Also competing for the championship are local athletes Liu Kwai-chi and Manuel Chan Gassmann, invited to the tournament by wild card. The former will face Japanese Satomi Watanabe and the latter Malaysian Ivan Yeun.

The tournament will be staged in two phases: games of the round of 32, 16, and the quarter-finals make the first phase; and the semi-finals and final in the second phase.

The first phase will take place from April 10 to 12 at the Macau Bowling Center in Cotai with free seating, while the semi-finals and final on April 13 and 14 respectively at Tap Seac Square in a tailor made all-glass court.

A carnival will also be held on April 14, which is the date for the final, at Tap Seac Square for the general public. There will be booth games and squash experience. Staff reporter

Related

Squash results.-

Results from the Junior Quadrangular tournament held in Hamilton between Auckland, Waikato, Bay of Plenty and Northland over the weekend.

Northland finished second behind Auckland who won for the tenth consecutive time. This was the best result for a Northland team since they were first involved in the tournament in 2013.

Scores:

Auckland (17) beat Northland (1)
Northland (11) beat Waikato (7)
Northland (10) beat Bay of Plenty (8)

Waka ama results.-

Finals results from the national secondary schools waka ama competition in Rotorua from March 26-29.

Whangārei Girls' High School:

Under-16 girls - W6 250-metres championship final: 2nd (1:05.02)
Under-16 girls - W6 500m championship final: 4th (2:37.21)

Kaitaia College:

Under-16 girls - W6 250m championship final: 7th (1:07.35)

Dargaville High School:

Under-19 boys - W6 500m plate final: 4th (2:21.54)

Te Kura Taumata o Panguru:

Under-19 girls - W6 500m plate final: 7th

Te Kāpehu Whetū:

Under-19 girls - W6 250m bowl final: 11th

Bowls results.-

Whareora Indoor Bowling Club:

March 27

1st - Alan McFarlane, Eleanor Holt, Paddy Holt, Heather Jaggard - 2 wins, 27 points

2nd - Stuart Smith, Don Tucker, Ian Goffin - 2 wins, 13 points

Open Pairs (March 30):

1st - John Tierney, Lyn Brittain

2nd - Don Simpson, Kia Ward

3rd - Marcel Ruedi, Topsy Wynyard

4th - Dave Ross, Dallas Campbell

Kamo Bowling Club:

Kamo Dairy & Lotto Domestic Drawn Triples (March 21):

1st - Marie Parker, Steve McAdam, Ray Bradley: 3 wins 39 points

2nd - Ron Kilduff, Dave Drummond, Gary Wolfgram: 3 wins 36 points

McLeod Bay Indoor Bowls Club:

Joy at the Bay, Competition Pairs (March 26)

1st - John Thompson and Ineke Buik: 2 wins 1 draw 11/27.

2nd - Graeme Richards and Helen Rozell: 2 wins, 1 loss 13/28.

3rd - Ken Rozell and Barbara Thompson: 2 wins, 1 loss 10/20

TEC - Jack Mortimore and Norma Boland

Dargaville Bowling Club:

Stott A/C Open Triples (March 24):

1st - Monty Stott, Jim Vallance and Steve Mrkusich: 3 wins, 22 ends.

2nd - Diane Klomp, Helen Nevill and Sue Rokstad: 3 wins, 21 ends, 46 points.

3rd - Bryce and Eileen Wyatt and Chris Garea: 3 wins, 21 ends, 41 points.

March 26

1st - Mike, John and William. 2 wins, 16 ends.

2nd - Ray, Lorraine and Roy. 2 wins, 12 ends.

Kauri Club grant recipients.-

Seventeen Northland sportspeople from 10 sporting codes received grants from the Kauri Club, Sport Northland announced yesterday .

Grant applications were assessed by the Northland Sports Talent Development Panel which was made up of representatives from the Far North, Kaipara and Whangārei districts and Sport Northland.

Grants were awarded twice a year and varied in size with the highest being $500. The funding would assist athletes in covering expenses incurred in travelling to events outside the region and overseas.

April 2019 Kauri Club recipients:

Alice McGregor (Whangārei): Karate

Anna Moselen (Whangārei): Squash

Brooke Fraser (Whangārei): Competitive Aerobics

Chay Edwards (Mid North): Inline Hockey

Emilia Finer (Mid North): Swimming

Esdmonde Parangi (Far North): Rugby League

Jessie Taylor (Whangārei): Netball

Kaleb Stevens (Mid North): Tennis

Makayla Templeton (Whangārei): Cricket

Mya Turner (Whangārei): Touch

Nathan Parkes (Whangārei): Cricket

Riley-Jack Vette-Blomquist (Whangārei): Squash

Rongomaiwahine Murphy (Whangārei): Karate

Ryan Townsend (Whangārei): Gymnastics

Te Kauwhata Kauwhata (Whangārei): Surfing

Tyler Jespen (Whangārei): Swimming

Zane Cooper (Mid North): Inline Hockey

ALAN Clyne is chuckling quietly when he says that the Olympics have “gone hipster” but he undoubtedly has a point.

Where once the event shone a spotlight every four years on traditional sporting endeavour like weightlifters straining, gymnasts tumbling, and athletes striving to go faster, higher or stronger, in recent times there has been a move towards including more avant-garde disciplines that stretch the interpretation of sport to its very limits.

SINGAPORE - Throughout the Schools National B Division girls' squash final on Wednesday (April 3), a favourite cheer among the Singapore Chinese Girls' School (SCGS) supporters was how their fellow student Rachel Tan "takes no Ls".

The chant proved both catchy and prophetic as the 16-year-old never looked like losing as she easily beat Methodist Girls' School (MGS) captain Michelle Lai 11-3, 11-6, 11-5 to secure the gold medal for her team.

Hers was the fourth match which clinched the tie at the Kallang Squash Centre before teammate Waverly Wu defeated MGS' Gabrielle Chong 11-9, 11-3, 11-4 to complete the overall 4-1 scoreline.

SCGS also won last year's final by the same margin.

Rachel, who is SCGS' vice-captain, pumped her fist and grinned at her supporters after winning her match. She ended the season with a perfect record from her eight matches.

"I was very happy because it's my last year in SCGS and I wanted to end it on a good note," she said. "I was nervous because it was the final, but I just told myself to do my best and forget everything else."

There was also added motivation for the SCGS team this year, as they were runners-up to the same opponents in the C Division competition two years ago.

And they begun strongly as SCGS captain Lim Yu Xuan and Hanaan Khaleel Hussein Abo Al Thinin both won their respective singles ties 3-0 to give the defending champions a 2-0 lead.

MGS' Cheyenne Mah halved the deficit after she overcame Felicia Ong 11-6, 11-8, 11-6, but it proved a short reprieve.

SCGS captain Yu Xuan, 16, acknowledged there was pressure to retain their title.

But she coped with those nerves by focusing on each point in the match instead of the raucous crowd, whose cheers after every point drowned out the voice of the marker announcing the score.

Her MGS counterpart Michelle, 15, rued her jittery start. She said: "I know I started off really badly, so I had to calm myself and think because my brain was like TV static... I gradually managed to calm myself down, but it wasn't in time."

This was MGS vice-captain Erin Chan's first B Division match this year after recovering from a torn elbow ligament and, while it ended with a loss, she was not disheartened.

The 15-year-old said: "I should be sad because it's our last year and I want to win, but I feel so proud after watching my teammates play and watching them each break their own mental barriers in squash.

"It's the friendship that will last... If I look back on this year, I wouldn't really care that I won or lost, I would care more that my team and I had so much fun together."